ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020
Can contrast-enhancement computed tomography texture and histogram analyses help to differentiate malignant from benign thyroid nodules?
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024Pooled it
- Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of thyroid follicular carcinoma using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and blood data.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- CT-based radiomics features for the differential diagnosis of nodular goiter and papillary thyroid carcinoma: an analysis employing propensity score matching.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Predicting the Risk of Thymic Tumors Using Texture Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Chest Computed Tomography.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to determine the ability of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) texture and histogram analyses to differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe clinical data from 49 patients with 60 thyroid nodules were retrospectively analyzed. Nodules were classified as malignant or benign based on their histological results. Five texture and histogram parameters of thyroid nodules from CECT images, including entropy, mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis, were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Regions of interest in axial CECT images were delineated manually by two radiologists. Interobserver agreement in texture and histogram parameters between the two radiologists was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were conducted to estimate the diagnostic capability of texture parameters.
resultsInterobserver reproducibility (ICC = 0.919-0.969) was excellent. Among the 60 nodules, 36 were malignant and 24 were benign. Entropy of malignant thyroid nodules was significantly higher compared with benign thyroid nodules (P = 0.005). A trend toward a higher kurtosis value was observed in malignant thyroid nodules (P = 0.062). When an entropy value of 6.55 was used as a cutoff for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules, the optimal area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.716 (0.585-0.847, 95% confidence interval, P = 0.005), 75.0%, and 62.5%, respectively.
conclusionsCECT texture and histogram analyses can be used to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32661879What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.