Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661876›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020

Differential distribution of and similar biochemical responses to different species of arsenic and antimony in Vetiveria zizanioides.

Huang Yu, Xizhe Yan, Xiafei Zheng, Kui Xu, Qiuping Zhong, Tony Yang, Feifei Liu, Cheng Wang, Longfei Shu, Zhili He and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dose-response impact of arsenite on wheat (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Huang YuEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xizhe YanEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xiafei ZhengEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Kui XuEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Qiuping ZhongEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Tony YangSwift Current Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current, SK, S9H 3X2, Canada.
Feifei LiuState Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510070, China.
Cheng WangEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Longfei ShuEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zhili HeEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Fanshu XiaoEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. xiaofansh@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Qingyun YanEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. yanqy6@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 19lgzd28the Hundred Talents Program through Sun Yat-sen University 38000-18821107the National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672262; 31802350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides L. Nash) has a great application potential to the phytoremediation of heavy metals pollution. However, few studies explored the bioavailability and distribution of different speciations of As and Sb in V. zizanioides. This study aimed to clarify the allocation and accumulation of two inorganic species arsenic (As(III) and As(V)) and antimony (Sb(III) and Sb(V)) in V. zizanioides, to understand the self-defense mechanisms of V. zizanioides to these metal(loids) elements. Thus, an experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to identify distribution of As and Sb in plant roots and shoots. Antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, SOD) and changes of subcellular structures were tested to evaluate metal(loids) tolerance capacities of V. zizanioides. This study demonstrated that V. zizanioides had higher capacity to accumulate Sb than As. For Sb absorption, Sb(III) content is significantly higher than Sb(V) in tissues of V. zizanioides under all concentration levels, despite the oxidation of Sb(III) on the nutrient solution surface. Additional Sb was mainly accumulated in plant roots due to Sb immobilization by transforming it into precipitates. As was more easily transferred to aerial tissues and had low accumulation rates, probably due to its restricted uptake rather than restricted transport. In many cases, two inorganic species of As and Sb showed almost same biotoxicity to V. zizanioides estimated from its biomass, SOD activity, and MDA content as well as functional groups. In summary, the results of this study provide new insights into understanding allocation, accumulation and phytotoxicity effects of arsenic and antimony in V. zizanioides. Schematic diagram of distribution of and biochemical responses to As(III), As(V), Sb(III), and Sb(V) in tissue of V. zizanioides.

Indexed as

AntimonyArsenicBioaccumulationBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiological AvailabilityBiomassChrysopogonHydroponicsMalondialdehydePlant RootsSuperoxide DismutaseTissue DistributionAntimonyArsenicMalondialdehydeSuperoxide DismutaseAntimonyAntioxidant enzymeArsenicPhytoremediationVetiveria zizanioides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.