SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2020
Robotic-assisted parathyroidectomy and short-term outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary hyperparathyroidism: targeted, focused exploration with "selective" parathyroidectomy : Minimally invasive open vs. minimally invasive video-assisted vs. endoscopic approach.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted thoracoscopy in the management of mediastinal ectopic parathyroid adenoma: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimal invasive techniques in endocrine surgery were lately adopted by surgical teams due to significant complications related to inadequate operative space and high risk of injuring crucial surrounding structures, such as vessels and nerves. Over the last years, technological improvements introduced robotic systems and approaches in endocrine surgery. Several case reports and series have described the safety and efficacy of these procedures such as robotic thyroidectomy and robotic parathyroidectomy. In the current review, we included 15 studies which described robotic-assisted parathyroidectomy for cervical parathyroid adenoma, in patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism or secondary hyperparathyroidism. No significant negative short-term outcomes were observed, in terms of postoperative complications, such as temporary or permanent injury of RLN, postoperative hypoparathyroidism and blood loss. The cosmetic result was, definitely, superior in comparison to conventional open parathyroidectomy. Despite the fact that RAP is an effective and curative method for patients with PHPT or secondary hyperparathyroidism, there are no available randomized clinical trials to establish this modern procedure as a gold-standard treatment strategy for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32661866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.