Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661814›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021

Partner Type and Young Women's Sexual Behavior: A Qualitative Inquiry.

Alyssa L Norris, Kate B Carey, Kate M Guthrie, Carla M Rich, Naomi H Krieger, Clair Kaplan, Michael P Carey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathways From Individual Characteristics to Subjective Consequences of Sex: The Mediating Role of Risky Sexual Encounters.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alyssa L NorrisCenter for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue, Coro West Suite 309, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. alyssa_norris@brown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-6802
Kate B CareyDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Kate M GuthrieCenter for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue, Coro West Suite 309, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Carla M RichCenter for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue, Coro West Suite 309, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Naomi H KriegerCenter for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue, Coro West Suite 309, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Clair KaplanDepartment of Clinical Research, Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael P CareyCenter for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue, Coro West Suite 309, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.

Funding

Reducing Alcohol-related HIV/STI Risk for Women in Reproductive Health ClinicsR34AA023158 · NIAAA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CAREY, MICHAEL P · 2016 to 2018
$661k
NIAAA NIH HHS R34 AA023158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has increased over recent years, particularly among young women. Partner type is believed to influence women's STI risk. However, researchers often restrict partner type to "casual" versus "committed," labels that can mask risk variability. Therefore, in this study, we identified and explored a range of sexual partner types in order to understand how young women's perceived risk and condom use intentions vary by partner type. Data were obtained during six focus groups of young women (N =25) who were recruited from a community reproductive healthcare clinic. Women described a range of monogamous and non-monogamous partner types that were distinguished based on partner regularity (i.e., whether the sexual partnership was ongoing) and personal relationship (i.e., degree of involvement outside of the sexual relationship). Women's perceived STI risk was higher and condom use intentions stronger with new partners, particularly unfamiliar partners (i.e., "one-night stand," "fuck boy"). Women identified potential harm from condom negotiation with all but the "friends with benefits" partners. However, the nature of this harm differed by partner type. Clinicians and researchers should consider how to support women in advocating for safer sexual behaviors across these partner types by understanding how partner regularity, degree of personal relationship, and emotional attachment differentially impact couples' condom use decisions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersYoung AdultCasual sexCondom useSexual healthSexual partner typesWomen

Identifiers

PMID32661814
PMCPMC7855024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.