ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2021
Knowing What To Do and When To Do It: Mental Health Professionals and the Evidence Base for Treatment Engagement.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding How and When Therapists Misstep: Navigating Engagement Challenges in Youth Mental Health Services.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025Trial
- Observed Engagement in Community Implemented Evidence-Based Practices for Children and Adolescents: Implications for Practice Delivery.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2023Observational
- Engagement Barriers to Behavior Therapy for Adolescent ADHD.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most mental health professionals encounter challenges to helping youth and families enroll and participate in mental health services. The empirical literature suggests that most engagement strategies are well-suited for certain types of engagement challenges. In this mixed-methods study, we examined whether mental health professionals reported using any solutions from the evidence base and, if so, the extent to which these procedures fit the engagement challenges they encountered. We surveyed all 244 mental health professionals working in a large urban school district about their experiences engaging youth and families in services. We coded professionals' written responses to open-ended questions about the challenges they encountered engaging youth and families in services, along with solutions they used to address these challenges. Most reported engagement challenges (83.3%) had a corresponding solution in the evidence base. Most reported solutions (86.5%) were practices found in the evidence base, yet most practices from the evidence base were infrequently nominated by professionals. Moreover, only 38.5% of professionals reported at least one solution that fit at least one of their challenges. In general, professionals reported using a narrow subset of engagement strategies from the literature, which often did not fit the engagement problems encountered. These results highlight opportunities for developing and disseminating a framework that explicitly coordinates evidence-based solutions matched to specific engagement challenges to support provider selection and application of engagement procedures and ultimately enhance youth and family engagement in services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32661787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.