Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661755›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2020

Transfer of an interprofessional emergency caesarean section training program: using questionnaire combined with outcome data of newborn.

Markus Flentje, Hendrik Eismann, Maike Höltje, Vera Hagemann, Lars Brodowski, Constantin von Kaisenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Markus FlentjeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Flentje.Markus@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3686-8998
Hendrik EismannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Maike HöltjeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Winsen Hospital, Friedrich-Lichtenauer-Allee 1, 21423, Winsen, Germany.
Vera HagemannFaculty of Business Studies and Economics, University of Bremen, Enrique-Schmidt-Strasse 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Lars BrodowskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Constantin von KaisenbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

puproseAn emergency caesarean section is a potentially life-threatening situation both for the mother and the newborn. Non-technical skills can be improved by simulation training and are necessary to manage this urgent situation successfully. The objective of this study was to investigate, if training of emergency caesarean section can be transferred into daily work to improve the outcome parameters pH an APGAR of the newborn.

methodsIn this pre-post study, 141 professionals took part in a training for emergency caesarean section. Participants received a questionnaire, based on the tools "Training Evaluation Inventory" and "Transfer Climate Questionnaire" 1 year after training. Outcome data of the newborn were collected from the hospitals information system.

resultsExcept the scale "extinction", Cronbach's alpha was higher than 0.62. All scales were rated lower than 2.02 on a 5-point Likert Scale (1 = fullest approval; 5 = complete rejection). "Negative reinforcement" was rated with 2.87 (SD 0.73). There were no significant differences in outcome data prior. The questionnaire fulfils criteria for application except the scale "extinction".

conclusionThe presented training course was perceived as useful by the professionals and attitudes toward training were positive; the content was positively reinforced in practice 1 year after training. Parameters of the newborn did not change. It is conceivable that other outcome parameters (e.g. posttraumatic stress disorder) are addressed by the training. The development of relevant outcome parameters for the quality of emergency sections needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationAdultCesarean SectionEducational MeasurementEmergenciesEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency TreatmentFemaleGermanyHumansInfant, NewbornInservice TrainingPatient Care TeamPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEmergency caesarean sectionInterdisciplinary collaborationSimulationTraining

Identifiers

PMID32661755
PMCPMC7447674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.