Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661672›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2020

FDG PET versus CT radiomics to predict outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients.

M Pavic, M Bogowicz, J Kraft, D Vuong, M Mayinger, S G C Kroeze, M Friess, T Frauenfelder, N Andratschke, M Huellner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dual-time-point [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. New Era for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Updates on Therapeutic Options.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. The Prognostic Value ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Radiomics in surgical oncology: applications and challenges.Computer assisted surgery (Abingdon, England) · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Multiblock Discriminant Analysis of IntegrativeInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M PavicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. matea.pavic@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-6152
M BogowiczDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
J KraftDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
D VuongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
M MayingerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
S G C KroezeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
M FriessDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
T FrauenfelderInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
N AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
M HuellnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
W WederDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
M GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
S Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
I OpitzDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Universität Zürich Clinical research priority programme CRPP "Artifical Intelligence in oncological imaging"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCareful selection of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients for curative treatment is of highest importance, as the multimodal treatment regimen is challenging for patients and harbors a high risk of substantial toxicity. Radiomics-a quantitative method for image analysis-has shown its prognostic ability in different tumor entities and could therefore play an important role in optimizing patient selection for radical cancer treatment. So far, radiomics as a prognostic tool in MPM was not investigated. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study is based on 72 MPM patients treated with surgery in a curative intent at our institution between 2009 and 2017. Pre-treatment Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and CT scans were used for radiomics outcome modeling. After extraction of 1404 CT and 1410 FDG PET features from each image, a preselection by principal component analysis was performed to include only robust, non-redundant features for the cox regression to predict the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS). Results were validated on a separate cohort. Additionally, SUVmax and SUVmean, and volume were tested for their prognostic ability for PFS and OS.

resultsFor the PFS a concordance index (c-index) of 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.82) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.78) for the training cohort (n = 36) and internal validation cohort (n = 36), respectively, were obtained for the PET radiomics model. The PFS advantage of the low-risk group translated also into an OS advantage. On CT images, no radiomics model could be trained. SUV max and SUV mean were also not prognostic in terms of PFS and OS.

conclusionWe were able to build a successful FDG PET radiomics model for the prediction of PFS in MPM. Radiomics could serve as a tool to aid clinical decision support systems for treatment of MPM in future.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical decision support systemMachine learningMalignant pleural mesotheliomaPrognostic modelRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID32661672
PMCPMC7359199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.