ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020
A multicenter paper-based and web-based system for collecting patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing local treatment for prostate cancer: first experiences.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcomes: active surveillance vs radical therapies in low-risk prostate cancer.BJU international · 2026Article
- An Overview of Patient-reported Outcomes for Men with Prostate Cancer: Results from the PIONEER Consortium.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Article
- Systematic development of a patient-reported ONCOlogical-ROUTinE-Screening (ONCO-ROUTES) procedure at the University Cancer Center Regensburg.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Precise Prediction of Long-Term Urinary Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by Readily Accessible "Everyday" Diagnostics during Post-Surgical Hospitalization.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
- Article
- [Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer-data from 17,149 patients from 125 certified centers].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Capacity-Building for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences (PRO) Data Across Hospitals.Maternal and child health journal · 2023Article
- [The interoperability of IIEF-5 with EPIC-26 : Sexual function after radical prostatectomy].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Observational
- Outcome Quality After Colorectal Cancer Resection in Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers—Patient-Reported and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022Observational
- Predictors for the utilization of social service counseling by prostate cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Observational
- Review
- From quality management to quality improvement-structures, processes and outcomes.World journal of urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo give an overview of the multicenter Prostate Cancer Outcomes (PCO) study, involving paper-based and web-based collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in patients undergoing local treatment for prostate cancer in certified centers in Germany. The PCO study is part of the larger Movember-funded TrueNTH Global Registry. The article reports on the study's design and provides a brief progress report after the first 2 years of data collection.
methodsProstate cancer centers (PCCs) certified according to German Cancer Society requirements were invited to participate in collecting patient-reported information on symptoms and function before and at least once (at 12 months) after treatment. The data were matched with disease and treatment information. This report describes progress in patient inclusion, response rate, and variations between centers relative to online/paper use, and also data quality, including recruitment variations relative to treatment in the first participating PCCs.
resultsPCC participation increased over time; 44 centers had transferred data for 3094 patients at the time of this report. Patient recruitment varied widely across centers. Recruitment was highest among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. The completeness of the data was good, except for comorbidity information.
conclusionsThe PCO study benefits from a quality improvement system first established over 10 years ago, requiring collection and harmonization of a predefined clinical dataset across centers. Nevertheless, establishing a PROM routine requires substantial effort on the part of providers and constant monitoring in order to achieve high-quality data. The findings reported here may be useful for guiding implementation in similar initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.