Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661594›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020

A multicenter paper-based and web-based system for collecting patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing local treatment for prostate cancer: first experiences.

Christoph Kowalski, Rebecca Roth, Günther Carl, Günter Feick, Alisa Oesterle, Andreas Hinkel, Thomas Steiner, Marko Brock, Björn Kaftan, Rainer Borowitz and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Predictors for the utilization of social service counseling by prostate cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph KowalskiGerman Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Strasse 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany. kowalski@krebsgesellschaft.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7438-4321
Rebecca RothInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Günther CarlHelp for Prostate Cancer Patients (Förderverein Hilfe bei Prostatakrebs e.V., FHbP), Tornesch, Germany.
Günter FeickFederal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Bonn, Germany.
Alisa OesterleOnkoZert, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
Andreas HinkelFranziskus Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany.
Thomas SteinerHelios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Marko BrockMarien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany.
Björn KaftanStädtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Rainer BorowitzKlinikum Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany.
Niko ZantlKlinikum Singen, Singen, Germany.
Axel HeidenreichCologne University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas NeisiusBarmherzige Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.
Christopher DarrEssen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Christian BolenzUniversity of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Burkhard BeyerMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Jesco PfitzenmaierEvangelisches Klinikum Bethel Johannesstift, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bernhard BrehmerDiaconal Hospital of Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.
Jan FichtnerJohanniter Krankenhaus Oberhausen, Oberhausen, Germany.
Björn HabenSt. Marien Hospital Ahaus, Ahaus, Germany.
Simone WesselmannGerman Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Strasse 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian DiengOnkoZert, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
Fischer (Germany) · DENeu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences · DEEssen University Hospital · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Oberhausen · DEFörderverein Hilfe bei Prostatakrebs · DEFrancis Hospital · DEHegau-Bodensee-Klinikum Singen · DEHelios Klinikum Erfurt · DEKernkraftwerk Gundremmingen · DEKlinikum Lüneburg · DEKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier · DEMartini-Klinik · DESt. Marien Hospital · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

Movember Foundation n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo give an overview of the multicenter Prostate Cancer Outcomes (PCO) study, involving paper-based and web-based collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in patients undergoing local treatment for prostate cancer in certified centers in Germany. The PCO study is part of the larger Movember-funded TrueNTH Global Registry. The article reports on the study's design and provides a brief progress report after the first 2 years of data collection.

methodsProstate cancer centers (PCCs) certified according to German Cancer Society requirements were invited to participate in collecting patient-reported information on symptoms and function before and at least once (at 12 months) after treatment. The data were matched with disease and treatment information. This report describes progress in patient inclusion, response rate, and variations between centers relative to online/paper use, and also data quality, including recruitment variations relative to treatment in the first participating PCCs.

resultsPCC participation increased over time; 44 centers had transferred data for 3094 patients at the time of this report. Patient recruitment varied widely across centers. Recruitment was highest among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. The completeness of the data was good, except for comorbidity information.

conclusionsThe PCO study benefits from a quality improvement system first established over 10 years ago, requiring collection and harmonization of a predefined clinical dataset across centers. Nevertheless, establishing a PROM routine requires substantial effort on the part of providers and constant monitoring in order to achieve high-quality data. The findings reported here may be useful for guiding implementation in similar initiatives.

Indexed as

CertificationFunctional statusHealth services researchImplementationImprovement interventionMultidisciplinary studiesPatient-reported outcomesProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32661594
PMCPMC7359206
OpenAlexW3041119263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.