ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2020
Reanalysis and integration of public microarray datasets reveals novel host genes modulated in leprosy.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential regulation of neutrophil degranulation by p38 MAPK and mitochondrial ROS duringFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cytokeratin expression and distribution pattern of epithelioid macrophages in animals with different pathological forms of bovine paratuberculosis: potential role in resilience to PTB.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- DExplore: An Online Tool for Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes from mRNA Microarray Experiments.Biology · 2024Article
- Whole blood transcriptomics reveals the enrichment of neutrophil activation pathways during erythema nodosum leprosum reaction.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota composition, function and gut-brain-modules in healthy adults - a systematic review protocol.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Article
- Gene expression patterns associated with multidrug therapy in multibacillary leprosy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Potential biomarkers and signaling pathways associated with the pathogenesis of primary salivary gland carcinoma: a bioinformatics study.Genomics & informatics · 2021Article
- A new paradigm for leprosy diagnosis based on host gene expression.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Blood RNA signature RISK4LEP predicts leprosy years before clinical onset.EBioMedicine · 2021Article
- In search of biomarkers for leprosy by unraveling the host immune response to Mycobacterium leprae.Immunological reviews · 2021Review
- Reduction of host cell mitochondrial activity as Mycobacterium leprae's strategy to evade host innate immunity.Immunological reviews · 2021Review
- Article
- Large-Scale Gene Expression Signatures Reveal a Microbicidal Pattern of Activation inFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- COVID-19, leprosy, and neutrophils.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Neutrophil NETworking in ENL: Potential as a Putative Biomarker: Future Insights.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to multiple hypothesis testing with often limited sample size, microarrays and other-omics technologies can sometimes produce irreproducible findings. Complementary to better experimental design, reanalysis and integration of gene expression datasets may help overcome reproducibility issues by identifying consistent differentially expressed genes from independent studies. In this work, after a systematic search, nine microarray datasets evaluating host gene expression in leprosy were reanalyzed and the information was integrated to strengthen evidence of differential expression for several genes. Our results are relevant in prioritizing genes and pathways for further investigation, whether in functional studies or in biomarker discovery. Reanalysis of individual datasets revealed several differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in accordance with original reports. Then, five integration methods (P value and effect size based) were tested. In the end, random-effects model and ratio association were selected as the main methods to pinpoint DEGs. Overall, classic pathways were found corroborating previous findings and validating this approach. Also, we identified some novel DEG involved especially with skin development processes (AQP3, AKR1C3, CYP27B1, LTB, VDR) and keratinocyte biology (CSTA, DSG1, KRT14, KRT5, PKP1, IVL), both still poorly understood in leprosy context. In addition, here we provide aggregated evidence towards some gene candidates that should be prioritized in further leprosy research, as they are likely important in immunopathogenesis. Altogether, these data are useful in better understanding host responses to the disease and, at the same time, provide a list of potential host biomarkers that could be useful in complementing leprosy diagnosis based on transcriptional levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32661593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.