Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661520›Full record

ArticleVipIMAGE 2019 : proceedings of the VII ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing, October 16-18, 2019, Porto, Portugal. VipIMAGE (Conference) (2019 : Porto, Portugal)2019

A Statistical Shape Model Approach for Computing Left Ventricle Volume and Ejection Fraction Using Multi-plane Ultrasound Images.

Dawei Liu, Isabelle Peck, Shusil Dangi, Karl Q Schwarz, Cristian A Linte

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in VipIMAGE 2019 : proceedings of the VII ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing, October 16-18, 2019, Porto, Portugal. VipIMAGE (Conference) (2019 : Porto, Portugal), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dawei LiuRochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Isabelle PeckRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA.
Shusil DangiRochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Karl Q SchwarzUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Cristian A LinteRochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Rochester Institute of Technology · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Biomedical Computing and Visualization Tools for Computer-integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutic Data ScienceR35GM128877 · NIGMS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Cristian A Linte · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) accurately requires 3D volumetric data of the LV. Cardiologists either have no access to 3D ultrasound (US) systems or prefer to visually estimate LVEF based on 2D US images. To facilitate the consistent estimation of the end-diastolic and end-systolic blood pool volume and LVEF based on 3D data without extensive complicated manual input, we propose a statistical shape model (SSM) based on 13 key anchor points-the LV apex (1), mitral valve hinges (6), and the midpoints of the endocardial contours (6)-identified from the LV endocardial contour of the tri-plane 2D US images. We use principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the principle modes of variation needed to represent the LV shapes, which enables us to estimate an incoming LV as a linear combination of the principle components (PC). For a new, incoming patient image, its 13 anchor points are projected onto the PC space; its shape is compared to each LV shape in the SSM based on Mahalanobis distance, which is normalized with respect to the LV size, as well as direct vector distance (i.e., PCA distance), without any size normalization. These distances are used to determine the weight each training shape in the SSM contributes to the description of the new patient LV shape. Finally, the new patient's LV systolic and diastolic volumes are estimated as the weighted average of the training volumes in the SSM. To assess our proposed method, we compared the SSM-based estimates of diastolic, systolic, stroke volumes, and LVEF with those computed directly from 16 tri-plane 2D US imaging datasets using the GE Echo-Pac PC clinical platform. The estimated LVEF based on Mahalanobis distance and PCA distance were within 6.8% and 1.7% of the reference LVEF computed using the GE Echo-Pac PC clinical platform.

Identifiers

PMID32661520
PMCPMC7357900
OpenAlexW2976402641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.