ArticleDistributed and parallel databases2019
Scalable and flexible management of medical image big data.
Article in Distributed and parallel databases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relevance of Kidney-Metabolic Multimorbidity Pattern to Metabolic Health and Mortality Among Elderly Inpatients in China.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- VAI-B: a multicenter platform for the external validation of artificial intelligence algorithms in breast imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Multi-user multi-objective computation offloading for medical image diagnosis.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Bridging the digital readiness gap in palliative home care: A process to data approach.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Digital imaging plays a critical role for image guided diagnosis and clinical trials, and the amount of image data is fast growing. There are two major requirements for image data management: scalability for massive scales and support of comprehensive queries. Traditional Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS for short) are based on relational data management systems and suffer from limited scalability and query support. Therefore, new systems that support fast, scalable and comprehensive queries on image data are highly demanded. In this paper, we introduce two alternative approaches: DCMRL/XMLStore (RL/XML for short)-a parallel, hybrid relational and XML data management approach, and DCMDocStore (DOC for short)-a NoSQL document store approach. DCMRL/XMLStore manages DICOM images as binary large objects and metadata as relational tables and XML documents based on IBM DB2, which is parallelized through data partitioning. DCMDocStore manages DICOM metadata as JSON objects, and DICOM images as encoded attachments in MongoDB running on multiple nodes. We have delivered two open source systems DCMRL/XMLStore and DCMDocStore. Both systems support scalable data management and comprehensive queries. We also evaluated them with nearly one million DICOM images from National Biomedical Imaging Archive. The results show that, DCMDocStore demonstrates high data loading speed, high scalability and fault tolerance. DCMRL/XMLStore provides efficient queries, but comes with slower data loading. Traditional PACS systems have inherent limitations on flexible queries and scalability for massive amount of images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.