Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661262›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Catalytic inhibition of H3K9me2 writers disturbs epigenetic marks during bovine nuclear reprogramming.

Rafael Vilar Sampaio, Juliano Rodrigues Sangalli, Tiago Henrique Camara De Bem, Dewison Ricardo Ambrizi, Maite Del Collado, Alessandra Bridi, Ana Clara Faquineli Cavalcante Mendes de Ávila, Carolina Habermann Macabelli, Lilian de Jesus Oliveira, Juliano Coelho da Silveira and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rafael Vilar SampaioDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. sampaiorv@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-8510
Juliano Rodrigues SangalliDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Tiago Henrique Camara De BemDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5969-6514
Dewison Ricardo AmbriziDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Maite Del ColladoDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-4855
Alessandra BridiDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9486-0121
Ana Clara Faquineli Cavalcante Mendes de ÁvilaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Carolina Habermann MacabelliDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5865-9156
Lilian de Jesus OliveiraDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Juliano Coelho da SilveiraDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-6393
Marcos Roberto ChiarattiDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8805-9469
Felipe PerecinDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-5863
Fabiana Fernandes BressanDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Lawrence Charles SmithCentre de Recherche en Reproduction et Fértilité, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada.
Pablo J RossDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-3754
Flávio Vieira MeirellesDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. meirellf@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orchestrated events, including extensive changes in epigenetic marks, allow a somatic nucleus to become totipotent after transfer into an oocyte, a process termed nuclear reprogramming. Recently, several strategies have been applied in order to improve reprogramming efficiency, mainly focused on removing repressive epigenetic marks such as histone methylation from the somatic nucleus. Herein we used the specific and non-toxic chemical probe UNC0638 to inhibit the catalytic activity of the histone methyltransferases EHMT1 and EHMT2. Either the donor cell (before reconstruction) or the early embryo was exposed to the probe to assess its effect on developmental rates and epigenetic marks. First, we showed that the treatment of bovine fibroblasts with UNC0638 did mitigate the levels of H3K9me2. Moreover, H3K9me2 levels were decreased in cloned embryos regardless of treating either donor cells or early embryos with UNC0638. Additional epigenetic marks such as H3K9me3, 5mC, and 5hmC were also affected by the UNC0638 treatment. Therefore, the use of UNC0638 did diminish the levels of H3K9me2 and H3K9me3 in SCNT-derived blastocysts, but this was unable to improve their preimplantation development. These results indicate that the specific reduction of H3K9me2 by inhibiting EHMT1/2 during nuclear reprogramming impacts the levels of H3K9me3, 5mC, and 5hmC in preimplantation bovine embryos.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCattleCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingCloning, OrganismDNA MethylationEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistocompatibility AntigensHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesNuclear Transfer TechniquesOocytesEHMT1 protein, humanEHMT2 protein, humanHistocompatibility AntigensHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesQuinazolinesUNC 0638

Identifiers

PMID32661262
PMCPMC7359371
OpenAlexW3041152775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.