SynthesisRevista espanola de salud publica2020
[Turnicity as a determining factor in the occurrence of insomnia in the working population: a systematic review.]
Synthesis in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between Night Shifts and Risk of Breast Cancer among Nurses: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Pooled it
- Insomnia Interventions in the Workplace: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Nightshift Rotation Schedule and Fatigue in U.K. and Italian Nurses.La Medicina del lavoro · 2024Article
- Professional Quality of Life of Healthcare Workers in Hospital Emergency Departments.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsomnia is the most frequent sleep disorder in the adult population with a prevalence of around 30% being responsible for the deterioration in the quality of life. At work level, shift work is the main risk factor associated with the onset of insomnia. Despite its clinical relevance, it usually goes unnoticed by healthcare professionals due to lack of time, resources or information. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of shift work in the occurrence of insomnia in the working population.
methodsSystematic review following the PRISMA statement. A bibliographic search using the DeCS terms "Insomnia", "Occupational Health" and "Shift Work" was carried out in the Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL databases, as well as in other sources such as the base of doctoral thesis data (TESEO). Articles published until November 2019 in English and Spanish were included. The methodological quality was evaluated through the CONSORT and STROBE guides.
results13 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. The methodological quality of the articles was high (STROBE: 18/22, CONSORT: 20/25). Based on the selected records, a prevalence of insomnia related to turnicity between 25% and 53% was identified. The duration and rotation of the shifts work influenced the onset of insomnia, with 12-hour shifts or fast and forward rotation systems being more beneficial. Other factors such as stress, anxiety, perceived health, healthy lifestyles and toxic habits, workplace accidents, fatigue or workload level were analyzed together with the turnicity.
conclusionsInsomnia influenced by turnicity is a public health problem worldwide that affects the quality of personal and work life. The characteristics and the context in which the work takes place in shifts, sometimes together with other factors, influence this affectation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32661221PMC11582867W3042830374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.