Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661186›Full record

ArticleESMO open2020

Phase I, open-label, multicentre study of buparlisib in combination with temozolomide or with concomitant radiation therapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Patrick Yung Wen, Jordi A Rodon, Warren Mason, Joseph T Beck, John DeGroot, Valerie Donnet, David Mills, Mona El-Hashimy, Mark Rosenthal

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Patrick Yung WenNeuro-oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA patrick_wen@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0774-7700
Jordi A RodonMedical Oncology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Warren MasonRadiation-Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph T BeckHighlands Oncology Group, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
John DeGrootNeuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Valerie DonnetNovartis Pharma SAS, Paris, France.
David MillsNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.
Mona El-HashimyNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Mark RosenthalMedical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1152-6764
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHighlands Oncology Group · USNovartis (France) · FRNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost glioblastoma tumours exhibit intrinsic phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo models suggest that buparlisib (an oral pan-PI3K inhibitor) can have an effect on glioblastoma directly and by enhancing the activity of radiation and of temozolomide.

methodsThis was a phase I, two-stage, multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation study of buparlisib in combination with temozolomide and radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. In stage I, patients who completed the concomitant phase of combination of temozolomide and radiation prior to study entry received buparlisib in combination with temozolomide. In stage II, patients received buparlisib in combination with temozolomide and radiotherapy in the concomitant phase and temozolomide in the adjuvant treatment phase. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of buparlisib when combined with the approved first-line treatment of temozolomide and radiotherapy.

resultsThe MTD of buparlisib in combination with temozolomide at stage I (adjuvant phase only) was 80 mg/day, which was used as the starting dose in stage II. The MTD of buparlisib in combination with temozolomide and radiotherapy in stage II (concomitant + adjuvant phase) was not determined due to the observed dose-limiting toxicities and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). In stage I, the most commonly reported AEs were nausea (72.7%) and fatigue (59.1%). In stage II, the most commonly reported AEs were fatigue and nausea (56.3% each). No on-treatment deaths were reported during the study.

conclusionConsidering that the primary objective of estimating the MTD was not achieved in addition to the observed challenging safety profile of buparlisib in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide, Novartis decided not to pursue the development of buparlisib in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaAdultAgedAminopyridinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorpholinesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesTemozolomideAminopyridinesMorpholinesNVP-BKM120Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesTemozolomideBKM120buparlisibglioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID32661186
PMCPMC7359189
OpenAlexW3041579002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.