Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661183›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2020

Clinical management of lipomas in dogs under primary care in the UK.

Camilla Leonie Pegram, Lynda Rutherford, Caroline Corah, David B Church, David C Brodbelt, Dan G O'Neill

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cutaneous and subcutaneous fibrolipomas in 236 dogs, 2017-2024: a retrospective case series and comparative review.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camilla Leonie PegramDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK cpegram@rvc.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-5294
Lynda RutherfordClinical Services Division, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
Caroline CorahDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
David B ChurchClinical Services Division, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
David C BrodbeltDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
Dan G O'NeillDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1115-2723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipomas are relatively common and biologically benign masses of mesenchymal origin consisting of adipocytes. This study reports benchmark data on the clinical management and outcomes of lipomas in dogs under UK primary veterinary care. The study used a cross-sectional analysis of cohort clinical data from dogs that were under veterinary care at practices participating within VetCompass from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013. Descriptive and analytic statistics characterised the clinical management and outcomes following presumptive lipoma diagnosis. The study included 2765 lipoma cases from 384 284 dogs under UK veterinary care during 2013. Diagnostics included fine needle aspirate in 1119 (40.5 per cent) cases, biopsy in 215 (7.8 per cent) cases and diagnostic imaging in 11 (0.4 per cent) cases. Overall, 525 (19.0 per cent) cases were managed surgically. Of the surgical cases, 307 (58.5 per cent) solely had mass removal whilst 218 (41.5 per cent) included another procedure during the same surgical episode. A surgical drain was placed during surgery in 90 (17.1 per cent) cases. Wound breakdown was reported in 14 (2.7 per cent) surgical procedures. Wound infection followed surgery in 11 (2.1 per cent) dogs. The findings provide veterinarians with an evidence base that benchmarks how lipoma cases are currently managed in the UK, but these results do not necessarily reflect optimal management or best practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDog DiseasesDogsFemaleLipomaMaleSurgical Wound InfectionUnited Kingdombenchmarkfatty massfirst opiniongeneral practicelipomavetCompass

Identifiers

PMID32661183
PMCPMC7799419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.