Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661148›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

The unusual

Qinghua Wang, Jun Huang, Yubin Li, Hugo K Dooner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qinghua WangWaksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Jun HuangWaksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Yubin LiWaksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Hugo K DoonerWaksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854; dooner@waksman.rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequent mutations recovered recently from the pollen of select maize lines resulted from the meiotic mobilization of specific low-copy number long-terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, which differ among lines. Mutations that arise at male meiosis produce kernels with concordant mutant phenotypes in both endosperm and embryo because the two sperms that participate in double fertilization are genetically identical. Those are in a majority. However, a small minority of kernels with a mutant endosperm carry a nonconcordant normal embryo, pointing to a postmeiotic or microgametophytic origin. In this study, we have identified the basis for those nonconcordant mutations. We find that all are produced by transposition of a defective LTR retrotransposon that we have termed

Indexed as

MitosisMutationPollenRetroelementsEvolution, MolecularGerm-Line MutationInbreedingPhenotypePlant BreedingZea maysRetroelementsLTR retrotransposonmaizepollenpostmeiotic transpositionspontaneous mutation

Identifiers

PMID32661148
PMCPMC7395433
OpenAlexW3043717812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.