Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661104›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2021

Impact of pharmacist interventions on drug-related problems in general surgery patients: a randomised controlled trial.

Salah AbuRuz, Deema Jaber, Iman Basheti, Aya Sadeq, Mosab Arafat, Mohammad AlAhmad, Amira Said

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Salah AbuRuzDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE saburuz@uaeu.ac.ae.
Deema JaberDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Amman, Jordan.
Iman BashetiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Applied Science University, Amman, Jordan.
Aya SadeqCollege of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mosab ArafatCollege of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mohammad AlAhmadCollege of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Amira SaidCollege of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Al Ain University · AEApplied Science Private University · JOUniversity of Jordan · JOZarqa University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe inappropriate use of medications is harmful and is a common issue in hospitalised patients. Patients hospitalised in general surgery wards are usually at high risk for drug-related problems (DRPs). This randomised controlled trial aimed to explore the value of a pharmaceutical care service conducted in general surgery wards in the identification and reduction of DRPs in comparison with standard medical care.

methodsThis study was conducted in general surgery wards including abdominal, cardiovascular, vascular, endocrine, orthopaedic and oncological surgeries at one of the largest teaching hospitals in Jordan over a period of 6 months. Recruited patients were randomised into intervention or control groups. Clinical pharmacists assessed patients' DRPs and submitted recommendations to resolve the identified DRPs in the intervention group.

resultsPatients in the intervention group (n=63) and the control group (n=60) had a mean age of 55±14.4 years, with 52.0% being women. A total of 1062 DRPs were identified, with a mean of 8.6±3.6 per patient (intervention group, 8.65±4.2; control group, 8.62±2.6; p=0.56). The commonly identified DRPs included safety (20.2%) and efficacy (19.0%) issues. The acceptance rate for pharmacists' recommendations by physicians was very high (90%) with a good DRP correction rate of 58.9% during patients' hospital stay. The value of pharmaceutical care was significantly reflected in the achievement of the therapeutic outcomes and prevention of morbidity (resolved/improved or prevented) of 68.2% (24.2%+44%) in the intervention group compared with 19.2% (12.4%+6.8%) in the control group (p<0.001).

conclusionsThis study shows that DRPs are common among general surgery patients in Jordan, especially those related to drug safety and efficacy. Pharmacists' recommendations contributed substantially to resolving most of the identified DRPs and had a significant impact on improving medications used in general surgery patients.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacy Service, HospitalPhysiciansAdultAgedFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMiddle AgedPharmacistsclinical pharmacyevidence based medicinemedical errorspublic healthsurgery

Identifiers

PMID32661104
PMCPMC8640438
OpenAlexW3041522510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.