Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661038›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of family medicine2020

Understanding Barriers to and Facilitators of Case Management in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Matthew Hacker Teper, Isabelle Vedel, Xin Qiang Yang, Eva Margo-Dermer, Catherine Hudon

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of family medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emotional Universe of Nurse Case Managers Regarding Care for Elderly at Risk in Spain: A Hermeneutical Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew Hacker TeperDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Isabelle VedelDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Xin Qiang YangDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eva Margo-DermerDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Catherine HudonDepartment of Family Medicine, Univer-sité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada catherine.hudon@usherbrooke.ca.
McGill University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite evidence on the benefits of case management for the care of patients with complex needs in primary care, implementing the program-necessary to achieve its benefits-has been challenging worldwide. Evidence on factors affecting implementation remains disparate. Accordingly, the objective of this systematic review was to identify barriers to and facilitators of case management, from the perspectives of health care professionals, in primary care settings around the world.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative findings. In collaboration with 2 librarians, we searched 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE) for studies related to factors affecting case management function in primary care. Two researchers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for inclusion, then assessed included studies for quality. Results from included studies were synthesized by thematic synthesis, and a framework was developed.

resultsOf 1,640 unique records identified, 22 studies, originating from 6 countries, met the inclusion criteria. We identified 9 barriers and facilitators: family context; policy and available resources; physician buy-in and understanding of the case manager role; relationship building; team communication practices; autonomy of case managers; training in technology; relationships with patients; and time pressure and workload. We describe these factors, then present a framework demonstrating the relationships among them.

conclusionsOur study's findings show that multiple factors influence case management implementation. These findings have implications for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers who strive to implement or reform case management programs in local or larger primary care settings.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareCase ManagementHumansQualitative Researchcase managementchronic diseasecomorbiditydelivery of health carehealth plan implementationhealth services misuseintegratedpatients with complex needsvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID32661038
PMCPMC7358023
OpenAlexW3040852065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.