Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32661022›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Cross-Frequency Phase-Amplitude Coupling between Hippocampal Theta and Gamma Oscillations during Recall Destabilizes Memory and Renders It Susceptible to Reconsolidation Disruption.

Andressa Radiske, Maria Carolina Gonzalez, Sergio Conde-Ocazionez, Janine I Rossato, Cristiano A Köhler, Martín Cammarota

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural Oscillations in Aversively Motivated Behavior.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Andressa RadiskeMemory Research Laboratory, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), RN 59056-450, Natal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8945-3182
Maria Carolina GonzalezMemory Research Laboratory, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), RN 59056-450, Natal, Brazil.
Sergio Conde-OcazionezSchool of Health Sciences, University of Santander (UDES), C.P. 680003, Bucaramanga (Santander), Colombia.
Janine I RossatoMemory Research Laboratory, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), RN 59056-450, Natal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7980-5842
Cristiano A KöhlerMemory Research Laboratory, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), RN 59056-450, Natal, Brazil.
Martín CammarotaMemory Research Laboratory, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), RN 59056-450, Natal, Brazil martin.cammarota@neuro.ufrn.br.ORCID 0000-0001-9741-5074
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidad De Santander · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avoidance memory reactivation at recall triggers theta-gamma hippocampal phase amplitude coupling (hPAC) only when it elicits hippocampus-dependent reconsolidation. However, it is not known whether there is a causal relationship between these phenomena. We found that in adult male Wistar rats, silencing the medial septum during recall did not affect avoidance memory expression or maintenance but abolished hPAC and the amnesia caused by the intrahippocampal administration of reconsolidation blockers, both of which were restored by concomitant theta burst stimulation of the fimbria-fornix pathway. Remarkably, artificial hPAC generated by fimbria-fornix stimulation during recall of a learned avoidance response naturally resistant to hippocampus-dependent reconsolidation made it susceptible to reactivation-dependent amnesia. Our results indicate that hPAC mediates the destabilization required for avoidance memory reconsolidation and suggest that the generation of artificial hPAC at recall overcomes the boundary conditions of this process.

Indexed as

Gamma RhythmTheta RhythmAnimalsAvoidance LearningCA1 Region, HippocampalMaleMemory ConsolidationMental RecallRats, WistarSeptal NucleiC/EBPβdeep brain stimulationfearforgettingPTSDretrieval

Identifiers

PMID32661022
PMCPMC7424867
OpenAlexW3043273066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.