Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660776›Full record

ReviewTherapie

Addictovigilance contribution during COVID-19 epidemic and lockdown in France.

Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre, Alexandra Boucher, Amélie Daveluy, Valérie Gibaja, Emilie Jouanjus, Michel Mallaret, Helene Peyrière, Joëlle Micallef, French Addictovigilance Network

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Appropriate Use and Abuse of Sedative-Hypnotic Drugs].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Review
  10. A Structural Validation of the Brief COPE Scale among Outpatients with Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maryse Lapeyre-MestreCEIP-A Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France. Electronic address: maryse.lapeyre-mestre@univ-tlse3.fr.
Alexandra BoucherCEIP-A Lyon, 69424 Lyon, France.
Amélie DaveluyCEIP-A Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France.
Valérie GibajaCEIP-A Nancy, 54035 Nancy, France.
Emilie JouanjusCEIP-A Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France.
Michel MallaretCEIP-A Grenoble, 38043 Grenoble, France.
Helene PeyrièreCEIP-A Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.
Joëlle MicallefCEIP-A Marseille, 13385 Marseille, France.
French Addictovigilance Network
CEA Grenoble · FRCentrale Marseille · FRCentre d’Etudes Politiques Et sociaLes · FRSciences Po Bordeaux · FRCentre d’Investigation Clinique Innovation Technologique de Nancy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addictovigilance is a safety monitoring targeted at substances with potential for abuse and dependence. This vigilance was involved during the period of COVID-19 epidemic due to the significant changes in access to drugs and psychological disruption caused by the pandemic and lockdown. This article aims to present the different steps implemented by the French Addictovigilance network in collaboration with the French Health authorities from March to May 2020, including monitoring of potential harmful events, and scientific communication. The first events were identified through the continuity of the networking between the French addictovigilance centres and their partners: community pharmacies, general practitioners, specialized structures and emergency wards. As soon as the lockdown began, first cases of overdoses (lethal or not) were reported with opioids, mainly with methadone, and other opioids (heroin, oxycodone, tramadol or antitussive codeine). Lockdown-related noteworthy events consisted in clinical cases or other relevant information for which lockdown clearly played an important role: among the many substances identified at least once, pregabalin, benzodiazepines, cannabis, cocaine and nitrous oxide were the most significant in terms of prevalence, seriousness or particularly specific to the lockdown context. Despite significant decrease in the activity and travel limited to vital needs, community pharmacies continued to identify falsified prescriptions in this period, highlighting an increase in suspicious requests for pregabalin, codeine and tramadol. In parallel, the French addictovigilance network continued its communications efforts in the period, issuing a newsletter on tramadol, a press release on methadone and naloxone, and participating in the COVID-19 frequently asked questions (FAQs) of the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutic website (https://sfpt-fr.org/covid19). COVID-19 epidemic has been an important challenge for addictovigilance, and has proved that this monitoring is highly essential for alerting health professionals and health authorities to points of vigilance in the field of psychoactive substances.

Indexed as

QuarantineCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Drug OverdoseFranceGeneral PractitionersHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSubstance-Related DisordersAbuseAddictionAddictovigilanceCocaineCOVID-19LockdownMethadoneNitrous oxidePregabalinPsychoactive substances

Identifiers

PMID32660776
PMCPMC7309935
OpenAlexW3036048791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.