Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660771›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[SBA 2020: Regional anesthesia guideline for using anticoagulants update].

Neuber Martins Fonseca, João Paulo Jordão Pontes, Marcelo Vaz Perez, Rodrigo Rodrigues Alves, Gabriel Gondim Fonseca

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neuber Martins FonsecaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Faculdade de Medicina, Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Faculdade de Medicina, Centro de Ensino e Treinamento (CET), Uberlândia, MG, Brasil; Comissão de Normas Técnicas da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil; Título Superior em Anestesiologia (TSA), Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Electronic address: neubermf@gmail.com.
João Paulo Jordão PontesHospital Santa Genoveva de Uberlândia, CET/SBA, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil; Título Superior em Anestesiologia (TSA), Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil; European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, European Society of Anaesthesiology, Bruxelas, Bélgica.
Marcelo Vaz PerezIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Conselho Editorial da Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Título Superior em Anestesiologia (TSA), Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Rodrigo Rodrigues AlvesHospital Santa Genoveva de Uberlândia, CET/SBA, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil; Título Superior em Anestesiologia (TSA), Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Gabriel Gondim FonsecaIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Anesthesiology Specialization, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRSociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia · BREuropean Society of Anaesthesiology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of protocols to prevent perioperative Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and the introduction of increasingly potent antithrombotic drugs have resulted in concerns of increased risk of neuraxial bleeding. Since the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) 2014 guideline, new oral anticoagulant drugs were approved by international regulating agencies, and by ANVISA. Societies and organizations that try to approach concerns through guidelines have presented conflicting perioperative management recommendations. As a response to these issues and to the need for a more rational approach, managements were updated in the present narrative revision, and guideline statements made. They were projected to encourage safe and quality patient care, but cannot assure specific results. Like any clinical guide recommendation, they are subject to review as knowledge grows, on specific complications, for example. The objective was to assess safety aspects of regional analgesia and anesthesia in patients using antithrombotic drugs, such as: possible technique-associated complications; spinal hematoma-associated risk factors, prevention strategies, diagnosis and treatment; safe interval for discontinuing and reinitiating medication after regional blockade.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAnesthesia, ConductionAnticoagulantsBrazilHemorrhageHumansPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsAnestesia, conduçãoAnestesia de conduçãoAnestesia regionalAnesthesia, conductionAntithromboticAntitrombóticosConduction anesthesiaRegional anesthesiaThromboembolismTromboembolismo

Identifiers

PMID32660771
PMCPMC9373103
OpenAlexW3025166335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.