Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660628›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery & related research2020

Autologous cell-free serum preparations in the management of knee osteoarthritis: what is the current clinical evidence?

Darshan S Angadi, Hamish Macdonald, Navraj Atwal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06415461 (A Phase 1, Open Label Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Preliminary Efficacy, and Dose Effect of CFL001 Cord Blood Product in Patients With Symptomatic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06415461 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 1, Open Label Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Preliminary Efficacy, and Dose Effect of CFL001 Cord Blood Product in Patients With Symptomatic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FloridaRan2024 to 2028Enrolled9ConditionsSacroiliac, Backache, Pain, BackArmsPremierMaxCB®-Platinum (CFL001)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. State of the Art: The Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs for Osteoarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darshan S AngadiDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Rd, Cheltenham, UK. docdarshan@gmail.com.
Hamish MacdonaldDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Rd, Cheltenham, UK.
Navraj AtwalDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Rd, Cheltenham, UK.
Cheltenham General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is paucity in the current literature regarding clinical outcomes of autologous cell-free serum preparations. The objective of this paper is to collate the clinical evidence and review the results of intraarticular injections of autologous cell-free serum preparations in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsA comprehensive English literature search was undertaken using the healthcare database website (https://hdas.nice.org.uk/). The PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were searched to identify all studies of autologous protein solution/autologous conditioned serum (ACS/APS) in the management of knee OA. We evaluated the reported clinical outcomes with respect to pain, function, morbidity, adverse effects and complications.

resultsFifteen relevant articles were identified in the current literature. Outcomes following injection of ACS/APS have been reported in patients with age range (34-87 years) and unilateral or bilateral knee OA. Seven studies reported improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) whereas the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis instrument (WOMAC) score improved in nine studies. Considerable variation was noted in the injection technique and duration of post-procedure assessment with only one study reporting long-term follow-up beyond 24 months. Joint swelling and injection-site pain were reported to be the most common complications; only one study reported a case of septic arthritis. However, no evidence is available to clearly identify factors that may predict the outcomes following this procedure.

conclusionCurrent data from the clinical studies would suggest that the intraarticular administration of autologous cell-free serum preparations, such as ACS/APS, in patients with knee OA may improve pain and function, with limited morbidity. High-quality clinical trials with stratified patient cohorts, longer follow-up duration and robust reporting of outcome measures are essential to improve the understanding of the indications and clinical effectiveness of these novel products.

Indexed as

AutologousConditionedKneeOsteoarthritisProteinSerumSolution

Identifiers

PMID32660628
PMCPMC7219223
OpenAlexW3027064646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.