Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660616›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Erosion of universal health coverage and trend in the frequency of physician consultations in Spain.

Lourdes Lostao, Elena Ronda, Cruz Pascual, Lucía Cea-Soriano, Almudena Moreno, Enrique Regidor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Health Investment Management and Healthcare Quality in the Public System: A Gender Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lourdes LostaoDepartment of Sociology, Medical Sociology, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. llostao@unavarra.es.
Elena RondaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Cruz PascualDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía Cea-SorianoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena MorenoDepartment of Sociology, Medical Sociology, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Enrique RegidorCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESUniversidad Publica de Navarra · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe studied the frequency of physician visits in the native and immigrant populations in Spain before and after implementation of a governmental measure to restrict the use of public healthcare services by undocumented immigrants beginning in 2012.

methodsData were taken from the 2009 and 2014 European Health Surveys carried out in Spain. We investigated any physician consultation in the last 4 weeks before the interview, as well as visits to a family physician, public specialist physician and private specialist physician. We estimated the frequency of visits in 2009 and in 2014 in the native and immigrant populations and the difference in the frequency between the two populations, by calculating the percentage ratio estimated by binomial regression and adjusted for different confounders that are indicators of the need for assistance.

resultsThe percentage of persons who consulted any physician in 2009 and 2014 was 31.7 and 32.9% in the native population, and 25.6 and 30.1% in the immigrant population, respectively. In the immigrant population, the frequency of visits to the general practitioner and public specialist physician increased, whereas in the native population only public specialist physician visits increased. The frequency of private specialist visits remained stable in both populations. After adjusting for the indicators of need for healthcare, no significant differences between the immigrant and native populations were seen in the frequency of visits, except for private specialist consultations, which were less frequent among immigrants.

conclusionThe restriction of universal healthcare coverage in Spain did not reduce the frequency of physician visits between 2009 and 2014, as the frequency of these consultations was seen to increase in both the native and immigrant populations.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsGeneral PractitionersHealth EquityNational Health ProgramsPatient Acceptance of Health CareReferral and ConsultationSpecializationAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpain

Identifiers

PMID32660616
PMCPMC7359494
OpenAlexW3042241709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.