Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660480›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Drug switching in the Netherlands: a cohort study of 20 active substances.

Pieter J Glerum, Marc Maliepaard, Vincent de Valk, David M Burger, Kees Neef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pieter J GlerumMedicines Evaluation Board, P.O. Box 8275, 3503 GB, Utrecht, The Netherlands. pieter.glerum@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-8393
Marc MaliepaardMedicines Evaluation Board, P.O. Box 8275, 3503 GB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Vincent de ValkNational Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.
David M BurgerDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kees NeefDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor a patient, drug switches are not desirable (either between a brand-name drug and a generic drug, or between two generic drugs of the same active substance). Research into the causes of drug switches, and related adverse drug reactions, is hampered by the absence of quantitative data on drug switches.

methodsWe describe the frequency of drug switches in the Netherlands for a selection of active substances. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Drug Information System of the National Health Care Institute in the Netherlands. We studied the Dutch patient population from mid-2009 to 2016. The selection of active substances (n = 20) was made based on a report by Lareb, the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre, on adverse drug reactions related to drug switching, and we used qualitative and quantitative descriptive analyses. A drug switch is defined as the replacement of a patient's prescribed drug with a similar drug from a different manufacturer.

resultsWe identified 23.8 million drug switches on a total of 206 million (11.6%) similar drug dispenses. The frequency of drug switches demonstrated a yearly peak in the period from January to March. In some months, for atorvastatin, losartan, pantoprazole, and irbesartan, more than 60% of similar drug dispenses were drug switches. Most drug switches (80.3%) were between two generic drugs, and 0.12% of these involved a drug from a European parallel import. The proportion of drug switches between two brand-name drugs decreased from 14.5 to 5.53% during our study period, and of these, 86.5% involved a drug from a European parallel import.

conclusionsDrug switching is common in the Netherlands, and most of the drug switches we studied are between generic drugs. The observed annual peak of drug switches is most likely explained by a specific Dutch reimbursement policy. Not only are the data valuable as is, but they also serve as a first step towards elucidating the reasons for the occurrence of these drug switches. In addition, these data can be used to put into perspective the adverse drug reactions associated with drug switching.

Indexed as

Drug SubstitutionCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDrugs, GenericHumansNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesDrugs, GenericBrand-name drugsDrug switchingGeneric drugsGeneric substitutionInterchangeability

Identifiers

PMID32660480
PMCPMC7359503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.