ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020
Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificially intelligent nursing homes: a scoping review of palliative care interventions.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation of eHealth to Support Assessment and Decision-making for Residents With Dementia in Long-term Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- The acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth interventions to support assessment and decision-making for people with dementia living in care homes: A systematic review.Frontiers in dementia · 2022Pooled it
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Identifying and Managing Comorbid Health Conditions Among Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: A UK Single-Site Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating Person-Centred Care Planning in Care Homes Across England: An Exploratory Study of Practices and Contextual Factors.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Implementation of an Electronic Medication Management System in 41 Residential Care Homes in Hong Kong: Pre-Post Interventional Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Best Practices for Implementing Electronic Care Records in Adult Social Care: Rapid Scoping Review.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Article
- Status of nursing documentation types in Indonesia and their association with nurse characteristics: A cross-sectional survey.Belitung nursing journal · 2025Article
- Using co-design to understand consumer's health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Factors impacting clinical data and documentation quality in Australian aged care and disability services: a user-centred perspective.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review.JMIR aging · 2023Review
- Optimizing the Quality of Clinical Data in an Australian Aged Care and Disability Service to Improve Care Delivery and Clinical Outcomes: Protocol for an Agile Lean Six Sigma Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Workflow interruption and nurses' mental workload in electronic health record tasks: An observational study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- 'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care.Journal of clinical nursing · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe electronic patient record (EPR) has been introduced into nursing homes in order to facilitate documentation practices such as assessment and care planning, which play an integral role in the provision of dementia care. However, little is known about how the EPR facilitates or hinders these practices from the end-user's perspective. Therefore, the objective of this qualitative study was to explore the usability issues associated with the EPR for assessment and care planning for people with dementia in nursing homes from a staff perspective.
methodsAn exploratory, qualitative research design with a multiple case study approach was used. Contextual Inquiry was carried out with a variety of staff members (n = 21) who used the EPR in three nursing homes situated in Belgium, Czech Republic and Spain. Thematic analysis was used to code interview data, with codes then sorted into a priori components of the Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework: device, software functionality, organisational support. Two additional themes, structure and content, were also added.
resultsStaff provided numerous examples of the ways in which EPR systems are facilitating and hindering assessment and care planning under each component, particularly for people with dementia, who may have more complex needs in comparison to other residents. The way in which EPR systems were not customisable was a common theme across all three homes. A comparison of organisational policies and practices revealed the importance of training, system support, and access, which may be linked with the successful adoption of the EPR system in nursing homes.
conclusionsEPR systems introduced into the nursing home environment should be customisable and reflect best practice guidelines for dementia care, which may lead to improved outcomes and quality of life for people with dementia living in nursing homes. All levels of nursing home staff should be consulted during the development, implementation and evaluation of EPR systems as part of an iterative, user-centred design process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.