Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660462›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screws with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element analysis.

Hui-Zhi Guo, Shun-Cong Zhang, Dan-Qing Guo, Yan-Huai Ma, Kai Yuan, Yong-Xian Li, Jian-Cheng Peng, Jing-Lan Li, De Liang, Yong-Chao Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui-Zhi GuoThe 1st Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510407, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Shun-Cong ZhangThe 1st Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510407, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Dan-Qing GuoThe 1st Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510407, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yan-Huai MaThe 1st Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510407, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Kai YuanSpine Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510407, China.
Yong-Xian LiThe 1st Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510407, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Cheng PengThe 1st Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510407, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jing-Lan LiThe 1st Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510407, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
De LiangSpine Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510407, China.
Yong-Chao TangSpine Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510407, China. 1114930308@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9569-0611
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

the innovation and strength project of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine 2019IIT32the project of Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau of Guangdong Provincial 20203004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is commonly used for cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) to improve the fixation stability and reduce the risk of screw loosening in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine. Biomechanical researches have shown that various dose of cement (1-3 ml) can be injected to enhance screw stability. To date, there have been no studies on the relationship between adjacent segment degeneration and the volume of PMMA. This study aimed to explore the influence of CAPSI with different volumes of PMMA in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae over adjacent segments by using finite element analysis.

methodsSeven different finite element models were reconstructed and simulated under different loading conditions, including (1) an intact model, (2) three single-level CAPSI models with different volumes of PMMA (1, 1.73, and 2.5 ml), and (3) three double-level CAPSI models with different volumes of PMMA (1, 1.73, and 2.5 ml). To improve the accuracy of the finite element analysis, the models of the injectable pedicle screw and bone cement were created by using a three-dimensional scanning machine and the CAPSI patient's CT data, respectively. The range of motion (ROM), the stress of intervertebral discs, and the stress of facet in the adjacent segment were comparatively analyzed among the different models.

resultsThe ROMs of the different segments were compared with experimental data, with good agreement under the different load conditions (21.3°, 13.55°, 13.99°, and 6.11° in flexion, extension, bending, and rotation at L3-S1 level, respectively). Compared with the intact model, the ROM, disc stresses, and facet stress in adjacent segments were found to be higher in the six operative models. Otherwise, with a larger volume of PMMA injected, the ROM, disc stresses, and facet stress slightly increased at the adjacent segment. However, the differences were insignificant with the biggest difference less than 3.8%.

conclusionsCAPSI could increase the incidence of disk degeneration in the adjacent segment, while within a certain range, different volumes of PMMA provided an approximate impact over the adjacent segment degeneration.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionBiomechanical PhenomenaBone CementsFinite Element AnalysisHumansLumbar VertebraePolymethyl MethacrylateRange of Motion, ArticularBone CementsPolymethyl MethacrylateAdjacent segment degenerationCement-augmented pedicle screwsFinite element analysisPolymethylmethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID32660462
PMCPMC7359596
OpenAlexW3041435401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.