Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660423›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Diversity and distribution of marine heterotrophic bacteria from a large culture collection.

Isabel Sanz-Sáez, Guillem Salazar, Pablo Sánchez, Elena Lara, Marta Royo-Llonch, Elisabet L Sà, Teresa Lucena, María J Pujalte, Dolors Vaqué, Carlos M Duarte and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic study and lipidomic bioassay ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Isabel Sanz-SáezDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Guillem SalazarDepartment of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5/10, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pablo SánchezDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena LaraDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Royo-LlonchDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabet L SàDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Teresa LucenaDepartamento de Microbiología y Ecología and Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo (CECT), Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
María J PujalteDepartamento de Microbiología y Ecología and Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo (CECT), Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Dolors VaquéDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos M DuarteRed Sea Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Josep M GasolDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Pedrós-AlióDepartment of Systems Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Olga SánchezDepartament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Facultat de Biociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain. olga.sanchez@uab.es.
Silvia G AcinasDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), 08003, Barcelona, Spain. sacinas@icm.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-0428
Institut Català de Ciències del Clima · ESUniversitat de València · ESCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESETH Zurich · CHKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council #226248Fundación BBVA BIOSENSOMICSKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology OSR-2014-CC-1973-02Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades CSD2008-00077Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades CTM2017-87736-RMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España CTM2012-34294Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España RTI2018-101025-B-I00Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad CTM2015-70340-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsolation of marine microorganisms is fundamental to gather information about their physiology, ecology and genomic content. To date, most of the bacterial isolation efforts have focused on the photic ocean leaving the deep ocean less explored. We have created a marine culture collection of heterotrophic bacteria (MARINHET) using a standard marine medium comprising a total of 1561 bacterial strains, and covering a variety of oceanographic regions from different seasons and years, from 2009 to 2015. Specifically, our marine collection contains isolates from both photic (817) and aphotic layers (744), including the mesopelagic (362) and the bathypelagic (382), from the North Western Mediterranean Sea, the North and South Atlantic Ocean, the Indian, the Pacific, and the Arctic Oceans. We described the taxonomy, the phylogenetic diversity and the biogeography of a fraction of the marine culturable microorganisms to enhance our knowledge about which heterotrophic marine isolates are recurrently retrieved across oceans and along different depths.

resultsThe partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene of all isolates revealed that they mainly affiliate with the classes Alphaproteobacteria (35.9%), Gammaproteobacteria (38.6%), and phylum Bacteroidetes (16.5%). In addition, Alteromonas and Erythrobacter genera were found the most common heterotrophic bacteria in the ocean growing in solid agar medium. When comparing all photic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic isolates sequences retrieved from different stations, 37% of them were 100% identical. This percentage increased up to 59% when mesopelagic and bathypelagic strains were grouped as the aphotic dataset and compared to the photic dataset of isolates, indicating the ubiquity of some bacterial isolates along different ocean depths. Finally, we isolated three strains that represent a new species, and the genome comparison and phenotypic characterization of two of these strains (ISS653 and ISS1889) concluded that they belong to a new species within the genus Mesonia.

conclusionsOverall, this study highlights the relevance of culture-dependent studies, with focus on marine isolated bacteria from different oceanographic regions and depths, to provide a more comprehensive view of the culturable marine bacteria as part of the total marine microbial diversity.

Indexed as

Arctic RegionsAtlantic OceanBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHeterotrophic ProcessesIndian OceanMediterranean SeaPacific OceanPhylogenyPhylogeographyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAWater MicrobiologyDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial isolatesDeep oceanDiversityPhotic ocean

Identifiers

PMID32660423
PMCPMC7359222
OpenAlexW3041929829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.