Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660224›Full record

ArticleIranian biomedical journal2020

Status of Biofilm-Forming Genes among Jordanian Nasal Carriers of Methicillin-Sensitive and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Ashraf I Khasawneh, Nisreen Himsawi, Jumana Abu-Raideh, Muna A Salameh, Mohammad Al-Tamimi, Sameer Al Haj Mahmoud, Tareq Saleh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian biomedical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Evaluation ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Article
  7. Study on the Prevalence of Methicillin-ResistantArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Article
  8. Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. TheMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Biofilm Formation in Methicillin-ResistantMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence and Characteristics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashraf I KhasawnehDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Nisreen HimsawiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Jumana Abu-RaidehDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Muna A SalamehDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Al-Balqa' Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan.
Mohammad Al-TamimiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Sameer Al Haj MahmoudDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Al-Balqa' Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan.
Tareq SalehDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Hashemite University · JOAl-Balqa Applied University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus is a major virulence factor. Both methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are common causes of community- and hospital-acquired infections and are associated with biofilm formation. The status of biofilm-forming genes has not been explored in Jordanian nasal carriers of S. aureus. This study investigates antibiotic resistance patterns and the prevalence of biofilm-forming genes between MSSA and MRSA in two distinct populations in Jordan. Methods: A total of 35 MSSA and 22 MRSA isolates were recovered from hospitalized patients and medical students at Prince Hamzah Hospital, Jordan. Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using disk diffusion method and Vitek 2 system. The phenotypic biofilm formation was tested using Congo red agar and microtiter plate assays. The prevalence of the biofilm-forming genes was determined using multiplex PCR. Results: Among 57 S. aureus isolates, 22 (38.6%) isolates were MRSA and were highly resistant against benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, and imipenem. The frequencies of the icaADBC were 77.1%, 97.1%, 94.3%, and 97.1% respectively in MSSA compared to 86.4%, 100%, 100%, and 100% in MRSA isolates. On the other hand, the frequency of the fnbA, fnbB, clfA, fib, clfB, ebps, eno, and cna genes was 81.8%, 90.9%, 95.5%, 90.9%, 86.4%, 100%, 100%, and 40.9%, respectively in the MRSA isolates. Conclusion: In both groups, MRSA isolates, in comparison to MSSA, were significantly more resistant to cefoxitin, oxacillin, imipenem, tetracycline, clindamycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Unexpectedly, biofilm formation and gene prevalence between MRSA and MSSA isolates showed no significant difference, suggesting other potential virulence mechanisms.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCarrier StateFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNoseStudents, MedicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusMethicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID32660224
PMCPMC7601545
OpenAlexW3042627130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.