Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660114›Full record

ArticleVaccines2020

Chicken DNA Sensing cGAS-STING Signal Pathway Mediates Broad Spectrum Antiviral Functions.

Shuangjie Li, Jie Yang, Yuanyuan Zhu, Xingyu Ji, Kun Wang, Sen Jiang, Jia Luo, Hui Wang, Wanglong Zheng, Nanhua Chen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MnVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Interplay between RNA viruses and cGAS/STING axis in innate immunity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuangjie LiComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Jie YangComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Yuanyuan ZhuComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Xingyu JiComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Kun WangComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Sen JiangComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Jia LuoComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Hui WangComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Wanglong ZhengComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Nanhua ChenComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Jianqiang YeComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.
François MeurensBIOEPAR, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire Oniris, CEDEX 3, 44307 Nantes, France.
Jianzhong ZhuComparative Medicine Research Institute, Yangzhou University, 88 South University Avenue, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-1993
Yangzhou University · CNInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672523; 31872450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The innate DNA sensing receptors are one family of pattern recognition receptors and play important roles in antiviral infections, especially DNA viral infections. Among the multiple DNA sensors, cGAS has been studied intensively and is most defined in mammals. However, DNA sensors in chickens have not been much studied, and the chicken cGAS is still not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the chicken cGAS-STING signal axis, revealed its synergistic activity, species-specificity, and the signal essential sites in cGAS. Importantly, both cGAS and STING exhibited antiviral effects against DNA viruses, retroviruses, and RNA viruses, suggesting the broad range antiviral functions and the critical roles in chicken innate immunity.

Indexed as

antiviralcGAS-STINGchickenDNA sensorssignaling pathway

Identifiers

PMID32660114
PMCPMC7563795
OpenAlexW3041723474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.