Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32660020›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2020

Feeding Interventions for Infants with Growth Failure in the First Six Months of Life: A Systematic Review.

Ritu Rana, Marie McGrath, Paridhi Gupta, Ekta Thakur, Marko Kerac

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ritu RanaIndian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382042, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6071-1750
Marie McGrathEmergency Nutrition Network, Oxford OX5 2DN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-1873
Paridhi GuptaIndian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382042, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0528-1625
Ekta ThakurIndian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382042, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2784-3783
Marko KeracDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3745-7317
Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar · INUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Introduction: Current evidence on managing infants under six months with growth failure or other nutrition-related risk is sparse and low quality. This review aims to inform research priorities to fill this evidence gap, focusing on breastfeeding practices. (2) Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library for studies on feeding interventions that aim to restore or improve the volume or quality of breastmilk and breastfeeding when breastfeeding practices are sub-optimal or prematurely stopped. We included studies from both low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. (3) Results: Forty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were from high-income countries (

Indexed as

Breast FeedingEnteral NutritionInfant FormulaInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBottle FeedingFailure to ThriveHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMilk, HumanWeight Gainbreastfeedinggrowth failureinfantmalnutrition

Identifiers

PMID32660020
PMCPMC7400880
OpenAlexW3041714168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.