Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Mayara Nunes Vitor AnjosLaboratory of Natural Products, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Luiz Nascimento de Araújo-NetoLaboratory of Medical Mycology, Department of Mycology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-4647
Maria Daniela Silva BuonafinaLaboratory of Medical Mycology, Department of Mycology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Rejane Pereira NevesLaboratory of Medical Mycology, Department of Mycology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Edson Rubhens de SouzaLaboratory of Medical Mycology, Department of Mycology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Isabelle Cristinne Ferraz BezerraLaboratory of Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Magda Rhayanny Assunção FerreiraLaboratory of Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8668-6223
Luiz Alberto Lira SoaresLaboratory of Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Henrique Douglas Melo CoutinhoLaboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Chemistry, Regional University of Cariri, Crato 63000-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-4207
Natália MartinsFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5934-5201
Márcia Vanusa da SilvaLaboratory of Natural Products, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Maria Tereza Dos Santos CorreiaLaboratory of Natural Products, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Regional do Cariri · BR
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
backgroundOpportunistic fungal infections are increasingly common, with
methodsMinimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by broth microdilution technique, and the mechanism of action was assessed by ergosterol, sorbitol, cell viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and phosphatidylserine externalization tests.
resultsAll the tested extracts evidenced antifungal activity, but the methanol extract was revealed to be the most effective (MIC = 3.12 μg/mL) on
conclusion
Indexed as
anti-candida activitymechanism of actionnatural productsOcotea glomerata
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.