Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32659386›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2020

Value of lipocalin 2 as a potential biomarker for bacterial meningitis.

T T Thanh, C Casals-Pascual, N T H Ny, N M Ngoc, R Geskus, L N T Nhu, N T T Hong, D T Duc, D D A Thu, P N Uyen and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

T T ThanhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
C Casals-PascualDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, CDB, Barcelona, Spain; ISGlobal Barcelona, Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
N T H NyOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
N M NgocOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
R GeskusOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
L N T NhuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
N T T HongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
D T DucDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
D D A ThuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
P N UyenOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
V B NgocOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
L T M ChauHospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
V X QuynhHospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
N H H HanhDepartment of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
N T T ThuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
L T DiemDepartment of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
B T B HanhDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
V T T HangOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
P K N OanhHospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
R FischerTarget Discovery Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
N H PhuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Department of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
H D T NghiaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Department of Infectious Diseases, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
N V V ChauHospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
N T HoaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
B M KesslerTarget Discovery Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
G ThwaitesOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom.
L V TanOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. Electronic address: tanlv@oucru.org.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine · VNUniversity of Oxford · GBVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City · VNBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701885Wellcome Trust 204904/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCentral nervous system (CNS) infections are common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. We aimed to discover protein biomarkers that could rapidly and accurately identify the likely cause of the infections, essential for clinical management and improving outcome.

methodsWe applied liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry on 45 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from a cohort of adults with and without CNS infections to discover potential diagnostic biomarkers. We then validated the diagnostic performance of a selected biomarker candidate in an independent cohort of 364 consecutively treated adults with CNS infections admitted to a referral hospital in Vietnam.

resultsIn the discovery cohort, we identified lipocalin 2 (LCN2) as a potential biomarker of bacterial meningitis (BM) other than tuberculous meningitis. The analysis of the validation cohort showed that LCN2 could discriminate BM from other CNS infections (including tuberculous meningitis, cryptococcal meningitis and virus/antibody-mediated encephalitis), with sensitivity of 0.88 (95% confident interval (CI), 0.77-0.94), specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) and diagnostic odds ratio of 73.8 (95% CI, 31.8-171.4). LCN2 outperformed other CSF markers (leukocytes, glucose, protein and lactate) commonly used in routine care worldwide. The combination of LCN2, CSF leukocytes, glucose, protein and lactate resulted in the highest diagnostic performance for BM (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99). Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD020510.

conclusionsLCN2 is a sensitive and specific biomarker for discriminating BM from a broad spectrum of other CNS infections. A prospective study is needed to assess the diagnostic utility of LCN2 in the diagnosis and management of CNS infections.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCentral nervous system infectionsLipocalin 2Mass spectrometryMeningitis

Identifiers

PMID32659386
PMCPMC8128987
OpenAlexW3041350568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.