Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32659314›Full record

ArticleMicrobial pathogenesis2020

Identification of enterobacteria in viscera of pigs afflicted with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome and other viral co-infections.

Ge Zhao, Lujie Zhang, Charles Li, Jianmei Zhao, Na Liu, Yuehua Li, Junwei Wang, Liheng Liu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial pathogenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ge ZhaoDepartment of Pathogenic Microorganisms, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, 266032, China.
Lujie ZhangInstitute of Animal Population Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China.
Charles LiAnimal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Jianmei ZhaoDepartment of Pathogenic Microorganisms, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, 266032, China.
Na LiuDepartment of Pathogenic Microorganisms, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, 266032, China.
Yuehua LiDepartment of Pathogenic Microorganisms, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, 266032, China.
Junwei WangDepartment of Pathogenic Microorganisms, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, Shandong, 266032, China. Electronic address: yffs2000@sina.com.
Liheng LiuInstitute of Animal Population Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, China. Electronic address: liulh0714@jxau.edu.cn.
China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center · CNJiangxi Agricultural University · CNBeltsville Agricultural Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to investigate enterobacteria presence involved in the secondary infections in Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) pigs with different viral co-infections, we identified enterobacteria for guiding clinical treatment. Twenty-one diseased pigs were diagnosed with the PRRS virus (PRRSV) and other 7 virus primers by PCR/RT-PCR in the lung and spleen samples. Enterobacteria were isolated using MacConkey agar from 5 visceral samples of PRRS pigs, and identified by 16S rDNA sequencing. PRRSV was positive in 100% of the lung samples and 81.0% of the spleen samples. Seven diseased pigs were diagnosed with only PRRSV infection (33.3%), 7 pigs with PRRSV and 1 or 2 other viruses (33.3%) and 7 pigs with PRRSV and more than 2 types of other viruses (33.3%). PRRSV was more inclined to co-infect pigs with porcine group A rotavirus (PARV) with the co-infection rate of 52.4% (11/21). Approximately 13 types of bacteria were successfully isolated from lung, spleen, liver, kidney and lymph node samples of different PRRS pigs. Enterobacteria were isolated in 100% of lung, liver and lymph samples from pigs infected with PRRSV alone. However, the isolation rates were significantly decreased in the more than 3 viruses co-infection group. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent bacterium, followed by Morganella, Proteus, Shigella, Salmonella, Klebsiella and Aeromonas. Most of the isolated enterobacteria were opportunistic pathogens. Therefore, timely combination with antimicrobial agents is necessary for effective treatment of PRRS-infected pigs.

Indexed as

CoinfectionPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusAnimalsEnterobacteriaceaeSwineViscera16S rDNA sequencingEnterobacteriaPCRPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndromeViral co-infection

Identifiers

PMID32659314
PMCPMC7352111
OpenAlexW3040849563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.