ArticleJournal of virological methods2020
Brief validation of the novel GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay.
Article in Journal of virological methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert Xpress to SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review.Journal of virological methods · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress and the Abbott ID NOW assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of medical virology · 2021Pooled it
- Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluation of the STANDARD M10 Flu/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Fast assay for the detection of influenza A/B viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, and SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab specimens.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value comparative analysis of the commercial kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Performance of a Combined Rapid Antigen Test for Detecting SARS-CoV-2, Influenza Virus, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Symptomatic Patients in Tertiary Care.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- CoVSense: Ultrasensitive Nucleocapsid Antigen Immunosensor for Rapid Clinical Detection of Wildtype and Variant SARS-CoV-2.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Article
- Head-to-head comparison of nasal and nasopharyngeal sampling using SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in Lesotho.PloS one · 2023Article
- Standardization of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques by Calibration and Quantification to the First WHO International Standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.International journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- FDA authorized molecular point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 tests: A critical review on principles, systems and clinical performances.Biosensors & bioelectronics: X · 2022Review
- Point-of-Care Platform for Rapid Multiplexed Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Respiratory Pathogens.Advanced materials technologies · 2022Article
- Performance of STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 Assay for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 from a Nasopharyngeal Swab.Infection & chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Validation of the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 using upper and lower respiratory tract specimens.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2022Article
- Direct comparison of Xpert Xpress, FilmArray Respiratory Panel, Lumipulse antigen test, and RT-qPCR in 165 nasopharyngeal swabs.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Recent findings and applications of biomedical engineering for COVID-19 diagnosis: a critical review.Bioengineered · 2021Review
- Development of Integrated Systems for On-Site Infection Detection.Accounts of chemical research · 2021Review
- SARS-CoV-2 immune repertoire in MIS-C and pediatric COVID-19.Nature immunology · 2021Article
- Sensitive on-site detection of SARS-CoV-2 by ID NOW COVID-19.Molecular and cellular probes · 2021Article
- Performances of the VitaPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay during the second wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in France.Journal of medical virology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical and epidemiologic management of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is critically dependent on molecular assays with short turn-around time. We validated the novel Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay using a commercial nucleic acid testing (Roche Cobas 6800). We found an excellent concordance over a range of SARS-CoV-2 loads and across established human coronaviruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.