Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658921›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Systems-level barriers to treatment in a cervical cancer prevention program in Kenya: Several observational studies.

Charlotte M Page, Saduma Ibrahim, Lawrence P Park, Megan J Huchko

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Living with Endometriosis: A Narrative Analysis of the Experiences of Kenyan Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte M PageDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8038-9487
Saduma IbrahimKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lawrence P ParkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Megan J HuchkoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke University · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

Evaluating a community-driven cervical cancer prevention model in western KenyaR01CA188428 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUCHKO, MEGAN J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify health systems-level barriers to treatment for women who screened positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in a cervical cancer prevention program in Kenya.

methodsIn a trial of implementation strategies for hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening in western Kenya in 2018-2019, women underwent hrHPV testing offered through community health campaigns, and women who tested positive were referred to government health facilities for cryotherapy. The current analysis draws on treatment data from this trial, as well as two observational studies that were conducted: 1) periodic assessments of the treatment sites to ascertain availability of resources for treatment and 2) surveys with treatment providers to elicit their views on barriers to care. Bivariate analyses were performed for the site assessment data, and the provider survey data were analyzed descriptively.

resultsSeventeen site assessments were performed across three treatment sites. All three sites reported instances of supply stockouts, two sites reported treatment delays due to lack of supplies, and two sites reported treatment delays due to provider factors. Of the 16 providers surveyed, ten (67%) perceived lack of knowledge of HPV and cervical cancer as the main barrier in women's decision to get treated, and seven (47%) perceived financial barriers for transportation and childcare as the main barrier to accessing treatment. Eight (50%) endorsed that providing treatment free of cost was the greatest facilitator of treatment.

conclusionPatient education and financial support to reach treatment are potential areas for intervention to increase rates of hrHPV+ women presenting for treatment. It is also essential to eliminate barriers that prevent treatment of women who present, including ensuring adequate supplies and staff for treatment.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health ServicesCryotherapyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Care RationingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforceHumansKenyaMass ScreeningObservational Studies as TopicPapillomaviridae

Identifiers

PMID32658921
PMCPMC7357749
OpenAlexW3042753514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.