Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Classification of 16S rRNA reads is improved using a niche-specific database constructed by near-full length sequencing.

Phillip R Myer, Tara G McDaneld, Larry A Kuehn, Keith D Dedonder, Michael D Apley, Sarah F Capik, Brian V Lubbers, Gregory P Harhay, Dayna M Harhay, John W Keele and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Detection ofFrontiers in microbiomes · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip R MyerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1980-2105
Tara G McDaneldUSDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States of America.
Larry A KuehnUSDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States of America.
Keith D DedonderCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Michael D ApleyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Sarah F CapikCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Brian V LubbersCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Gregory P HarhayUSDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States of America.
Dayna M HarhayUSDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States of America.
John W KeeleUSDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States of America.
Madison T HennigerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
Brooke A ClemmonsDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
Timothy P L SmithUSDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States of America.
Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · USKansas State University · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveys of microbial populations in environmental niches of interest often utilize sequence variation in the gene encoding the ribosomal small subunit (the 16S rRNA gene). Generally, these surveys target the 16S genes using semi-degenerate primers to amplify portions of a subset of bacterial species, sequence the amplicons in bulk, and assign to putative taxonomic categories by comparison to databases purporting to connect specific sequences in the main variable regions of the gene to specific organisms. Due to sequence length constraints of the most popular bulk sequencing platforms, the primers selected amplify one to three of the nine variable regions, and taxonomic assignment is based on relatively short stretches of sequence (150-500 bases). We demonstrate that taxonomic assignment is improved through reduced unassigned reads by including a survey of near-full-length sequences specific to the target environment, using a niche of interest represented by the upper respiratory tract (URT) of cattle. We created a custom Bovine URT database from these longer sequences for assignment of shorter, less expensive reads in comparisons of the upper respiratory tract among individual animals. This process improves the ability to detect changes in the microbial populations of a given environment, and the accuracy of defining the content of that environment at increasingly higher taxonomic resolution.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAnimalsCattleReference StandardsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32658916
PMCPMC7357769
OpenAlexW3041144101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.