Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658902›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Tengger tribe in Ngadisari village, Indonesia.

Nurul Jadid, Erwin Kurniawan, Chusnul Eka Safitri Himayani, Andriyani, Indah Prasetyowati, Kristanti Indah Purwani, Wirdhatul Muslihatin, Dewi Hidayati, Indah Trisnawati Dwi Tjahjaningrum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ethnic, Botanic, Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nurul JadidDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-4919
Erwin KurniawanDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Chusnul Eka Safitri HimayaniDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
AndriyaniDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Indah PrasetyowatiDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8637-0851
Kristanti Indah PurwaniDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Wirdhatul MuslihatinDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Dewi HidayatiDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Indah Trisnawati Dwi TjahjaningrumDepartment of Biology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The people of Tengger, Indonesia have used plants as traditional medicine for a long time. However, this local knowledge has not been well documented until recently. Our study aims to understand the utilization of plants in traditional medicine by the people of Tengger, who inhabit the Ngadisari village, Sukapura District, Probolinggo Regency, Indonesia. We conducted semi-structured and structured interviews with a total of 52 informants that represented 10% of the total family units in the village. The parameters observed in this study include species use value (SUV), family use value (FUV), plant part use (PPU), and the relative frequency of citation that was calculated based on fidelity level (FL). We successfully identified 30 species belonging to 28 genera and 20 families that have been used as a traditional medicine to treat 20 diseases. We clustered all the diseases into seven distinct categories. Among the recorded plant families, Poaceae and Zingiberaceae were the most abundant. Plant species within those families were used to treat internal medical diseases, respiratory-nose, ear, oral/dental, and throat problems. The plant species with the highest SUV was Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (1.01), whereas the Aloaceae family (0.86) had the highest FUV. Acorus calamus L. (80%) had the highest FL percentage. The leaves were identified as the most used plant part and decoction was the dominant mode of a medicinal preparation. Out of the plants and their uses documented in our study, 26.7% of the medicinal plants and 71.8% of the uses were novel. In conclusion, the diversity of medicinal plant uses in the Ngadisari village could contribute to the development of new plant-based drugs and improve the collective revenue of the local society.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyHumansIndigenous PeoplesIndonesiaMedicine, East Asian TraditionalPlants, MedicinalPoaceaeZingiberaceae

Identifiers

PMID32658902
PMCPMC7357767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.