Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658893›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Epistatic interactions between PHOTOPERIOD1, CONSTANS1 and CONSTANS2 modulate the photoperiodic response in wheat.

Lindsay M Shaw, Chengxia Li, Daniel P Woods, Maria A Alvarez, Huiqiong Lin, Mei Y Lau, Andrew Chen, Jorge Dubcovsky

Expression of concernOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Novel PHOTOPERIOD-1 gene variants associate with yield-related and root-angle traits in European bread wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsay M ShawDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8078-2409
Chengxia LiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4634-8451
Daniel P WoodsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1498-5707
Maria A AlvarezDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-4255
Huiqiong LinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Mei Y LauDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Andrew ChenDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Jorge DubcovskyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7571-4345
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USPlant (United States) · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Arabidopsis, CONSTANS (CO) integrates light and circadian clock signals to promote flowering under long days (LD). In the grasses, a duplication generated two paralogs designated as CONSTANS1 (CO1) and CONSTANS2 (CO2). Here we show that in tetraploid wheat plants grown under LD, combined loss-of-function mutations in the A and B-genome homeologs of CO1 and CO2 (co1 co2) result in a small (3 d) but significant (P<0.0001) acceleration of heading time both in PHOTOPERIOD1 (PPD1) sensitive (Ppd-A1b, functional ancestral allele) and insensitive (Ppd-A1a, functional dominant allele) backgrounds. Under short days (SD), co1 co2 mutants headed 13 d earlier than the wild type (P<0.0001) in the presence of Ppd-A1a. However, in the presence of Ppd-A1b, spikes from both genotypes failed to emerge by 180 d. These results indicate that CO1 and CO2 operate mainly as weak heading time repressors in both LD and SD. By contrast, in ppd1 mutants with loss-of-function mutations in both PPD1 homeologs, the wild type Co1 allele accelerated heading time >60 d relative to the co1 mutant allele under LD. We detected significant genetic interactions among CO1, CO2 and PPD1 genes on heading time, which were reflected in complex interactions at the transcriptional and protein levels. Loss-of-function mutations in PPD1 delayed heading more than combined co1 co2 mutations and, more importantly, PPD1 was able to perceive and respond to differences in photoperiod in the absence of functional CO1 and CO2 genes. Similarly, CO1 was able to accelerate heading time in response to LD in the absence of a functional PPD1. Taken together, these results indicate that PPD1 and CO1 are able to respond to photoperiod in the absence of each other, and that interactions between these two photoperiod pathways at the transcriptional and protein levels are important to fine-tune the flowering response in wheat.

Indexed as

PhotoperiodAllelesArabidopsisCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmEpistasis, GeneticFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypePlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsTriticumPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID32658893
PMCPMC7394450
OpenAlexW3043266360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.