Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658860›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Online Antenatal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Challenges.

Huailiang Wu, Weiwei Sun, Xinyu Huang, Shinning Yu, Hao Wang, Xiaoyu Bi, Jie Sheng, Sihan Chen, Babatunde Akinwunmi, Casper J P Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Huailiang Wu *Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-3945
Weiwei Sun *Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7766-8119
Xinyu Huang *Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4015-1316
Shinning YuFaculty of Medicine, International School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6615-5684
Hao WangDepartment of Culture and Tourism, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-7109
Xiaoyu BiCollege of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4713-2521
Jie ShengCollege of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5912-8410
Sihan ChenDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-5777
Babatunde AkinwunmiMaternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8316-1552
Casper J P ZhangSchool of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1047-0287
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-7515
Jinan University · CNBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HKXiamen University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People across the world have been greatly affected by the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The high infection risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in hospitals is particularly problematic for recently delivered mothers and currently pregnant women who require professional antenatal care. Online antenatal care would be a preferable alternative for these women since it can provide pregnancy-related information and remote clinic consultations. In addition, online antenatal care may help to provide relatively economical medical services and diminish health care inequality due to its convenience and cost-effectiveness, especially in developing countries or regions. However, some pregnant women will doubt the reliability of such online information. Therefore, it is important to ensure the quality and safety of online services and establish a stable, mutual trust between the pregnant women, the obstetric care providers and the technology vis-a-vis the online programs. Here, we report how the COVID-19 pandemic brings not only opportunities for the development and popularization of online antenatal care programs but also challenges.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralCOVID-19FemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareRemote ConsultationReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2antenatalconveniencecoronavirus diseaseCOVID-19inequalityonline educationonline prenatal educationpregnancySARS-CoV-2telehealth

Identifiers

PMID32658860
PMCPMC7407486
OpenAlexW3043486170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.