Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658836›Full record

ArticleRespiratory medicine2020

Patient characteristics associated with adherence to pulmonary nodule guidelines.

Jonathan M Iaccarino, Katrina Steiling, Christopher G Slatore, Mari-Lynn Drainoni, Renda Soylemez Wiener

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan M IaccarinoThe Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: jmi@bu.edu.
Katrina SteilingThe Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher G SlatoreCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA; Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Renda Soylemez WienerThe Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, ENRM VA Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA.
Boston University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001430 · NCATS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BAIR-MERRITT, MEGAN H, CENTER, DAVID M. · 2015 to 2024
$52.3M
BIOLOGY OF THE LUNG--MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMT32HL007035 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Darrell N. Kotton, JOSEPH P MIZGERD · 1985 to 2026
$24.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001430NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile pulmonary nodule guidelines provide follow-up recommendations based on nodule size and malignancy risk, these are inconsistently followed in clinical practice. In this study, we sought to identify patient characteristics associated with guideline-concordant nodule follow-up.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with a pulmonary nodule between 2011 and 2014 at Boston Medical Center. Appropriate nodule follow-up evaluation was based upon the 2005 Fleischner Society Guidelines. In primary analysis, we compared patients with guideline-concordant follow-up to those with delayed or absent follow-up. In secondary analysis, we compared those with any follow-up to those without follow-up as well as the rate of guideline-concordant follow-up in patients seen by a pulmonologist.

resultsOf 3916 patients diagnosed with a pulmonary nodule, 1117 were included for analysis. Overall, 598 (53.5%) patients received guideline-concordant follow-up. Lower rates of guideline concordance were seen in patients of Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-1.00), while higher rates were seen for nodules 7-8 mm (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.35) and nodules >8 mm (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.20). Having a history of COPD (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.43), and being seen by a pulmonologist (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.51-2.58) were also associated with guideline concordance. Among patients seen by a pulmonologist, 62.2% received guideline-concordant follow-up.

conclusionOverall rates of pulmonary nodule follow-up are low. Patient ethnicity, COPD history, nodule size and involvement of a pulmonologist may impact follow-up rates and are potential targets for implementation interventions to improve pulmonary nodule follow-up.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAftercareAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonologistsRetrospective StudiesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleClinical guidelinesHealth services researchPulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID32658836
PMCPMC12812328
OpenAlexW2788700852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.