Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658721›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2020

Convolutional Neural Network ensembles for accurate lung nodule malignancy prediction 2 years in the future.

Rahul Paul, Matthew Schabath, Robert Gillies, Lawrence Hall, Dmitry Goldgof

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Contemporary issues in the implementation of lung cancer screening.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rahul PaulDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: rahulp@mail.usf.edu.
Matthew SchabathDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, H. L. Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Robert GilliesDepartment of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. L. Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Lawrence HallDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Dmitry GoldgofDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
University of South Florida · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Quantitative Imaging Clinical Validation Center at Moffitt Cancer CenterU01CA200464 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI JOHN J HEINE, Matthew B. Schabath · 2016 to 2026
$9.2M
Radiomics of NSCLCU01CA143062 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GILLIES, ROBERT J., SCHABATH, MATTHEW B. · 2010 to 2020
$5.7M
Cellular, molecular and quantitative imaging analysis of screening-detected lung adenocarcinomaU01CA196405 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALDONADO, FABIEN · 2015 to 2020
$5.4M
Informatics Tools for Optimized Imaging Biomarkers for Cancer Research&DiscoveryU24CA180927 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Non-invasive evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodulesU01CA186145 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MASSION, PIERRE P. · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA143062NCI NIH HHS U01 CA186145NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196405NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200464NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been utilized for to distinguish between benign lung nodules and those that will become malignant. The objective of this study was to use an ensemble of CNNs to predict which baseline nodules would be diagnosed as lung cancer in a second follow up screening after more than one year. Low-dose helical computed tomography images and data were utilized from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). The malignant nodules and nodule positive controls were divided into training and test cohorts. T0 nodules were used to predict lung cancer incidence at T1 or T2. To increase the sample size, image augmentation was performed using rotations, flipping, and elastic deformation. Three CNN architectures were designed for malignancy prediction, and each architecture was trained using seven different seeds to create the initial weights. This enabled variability in the CNN models which were combined to generate a robust, more accurate ensemble model. Augmenting images using only rotation and flipping and training with images from T0 yielded the best accuracy to predict lung cancer incidence at T2 from a separate test cohort (Accuracy = 90.29%; AUC = 0.96) based on an ensemble 21 models. Images augmented by rotation and flipping enabled effective learning by increasing the relatively small sample size. Ensemble learning with deep neural networks is a compelling approach that accurately predicted lung cancer incidence at the second screening after the baseline screen mostly 2 years later.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCohort StudiesHumansLungNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional Neural NetworkEnsemble classificationLung NoduleNSCLCRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID32658721
PMCPMC8108139
OpenAlexW3037557326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.