Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658532›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2021

Tobacco-use behavior and toxicant exposure among current dual users of electronic cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes.

Caroline O Cobb, Rebecca C Lester, Alyssa K Rudy, Cosima Hoetger, Megan Scott, Makeda Austin, Alison Montpetit, Thokozeni Lipato, Amanda L Graham, Andrew J Barnes and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Young users of electronic cigarettes exhibit reduced cardiorespiratory fitness.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline O CobbDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.ORCID 0000-0003-3258-252X
Rebecca C LesterDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Alyssa K RudyDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Cosima HoetgerDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Megan ScottDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Makeda AustinDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Alison MontpetitVirginia Commonwealth University Health System.
Thokozeni LipatoCenter for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Amanda L GrahamTruth Initiative.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-9653
Andrew J BarnesCenter for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Thomas EissenbergDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.ORCID 0000-0002-8277-5437
Virginia Commonwealth University · USAmerican Legacy Foundation · US

Funding

Project 4: Using a prospective cohort survey to test population-level predictions generated by Projects 1-3U54DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BRELAND, ALISON · 2018 to 2022
$20.8M
Behavior and toxicant exposure among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettesR21CA184634 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI COBB, CAROLINE O · 2014 to 2015
$419k
National Institutes of Health; National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug AbuseNCI NIH HHS R21 CA184634NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use continues to grow with most users reporting concurrent cigarette smoking, but few studies have focused on tobacco use and toxicant exposure among naturalistic dual-using populations. This controlled clinical laboratory study examined how dual versus exclusive use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes and no tobacco/nicotine affected behavioral, physiological, and subjective measures among current dual users. Twenty-two participants identifying as cigarette (≥ 10 cigarettes per day [CPD]) and e-cigarette (≥ 3 days/week) users of "cig-a-like" e-cigarettes completed four 5-day outpatient conditions, which differed by their own brand of products used ad libitum: (a) cigarette and e-cigarette (dual), (b) cigarette-only, (c) e-cigarette-only, and (d) no tobacco/nicotine. Primary outcomes included daily tobacco use, expired air carbon monoxide (CO), and urinary cotinine and NNAL. Linear mixed models with pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni corrected) were performed (p < .05). CPD did not differ significantly between dual and cigarette-only use, but e-cigarette use and liquid consumed increased significantly during e-cigarette-only relative to dual use. Relative to dual use, expired air CO did not differ during cigarette-only and was significantly lower during e-cigarette-only use. Urinary cotinine was significantly lower during e-cigarette-only use relative to dual and cigarette-only use, while urinary NNAL did not differ between the nicotine-containing conditions. In summary, among current dual users, e-cigarettes in combination with cigarettes did not reduce CPD relative to exclusive cigarette use or toxicant exposure relative to exclusive use of either product. However, exclusive e-cigarette use did reduce CO and cotinine, highlighting the benefits of cigarette cessation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsHumansLaboratories, ClinicalSmokersTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID32658532
PMCPMC9307076
OpenAlexW3042733533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.