ArticleEpilepsia2020
Real-world experience with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal onset seizures.
Article in Epilepsia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- The comparison of DBS and RNS for adult drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Gamma suppression correlates with thalamic stimulation therapeutic response in intractable epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Implant-Grade Neural Sensing with Artifact-Resilient Computational Intelligence Preserves Spatial Fidelity of HFO Biomarkers in Epilepsy.Research square · 2026Article
- Corticocortical evoked potential amplitude is altered by cortical stimulation in epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Review
- Laminar organization of cellular microcircuits modulating human interictal epileptiform discharges.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Postapproval Study for Brain-Responsive Neurostimulation for Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: Three-Year Efficacy and Interim Safety Results.Neurology · 2026Article
- Hierarchically Restructured Antibacterial Electrodes for Neural Interfaces: Electrochemical and Microstructural Evolution under Extended Cycling.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Responsive neurostimulation in children, adolescents, and young Adults-Longitudinal effectiveness and safety.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Safety of Intracranial Neuromodulation in Drug-Resistant Pediatric and Adult Epilepsy.Neurology · 2026Article
- sEEG-guided responsive neurostimulation to treat neocortical epilepsy: A multicenter retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of depth electrode-mediated neuromodulation.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Brain-computer interface: an update for the clinicians.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Smart bio-implants for seizure prediction in tuberous sclerosis complex.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Event driven neural network on a mixed signal neuromorphic processor for EEG based epileptic seizure detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Single-center retrospective analysis of responsive neurostimulation outcomes.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Healthcare Utilization and Cost in the Two Years Before Neuromodulation Implantation Among Medicaid Enrollees with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
- Intracranial neuromodulation for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: early institutional experience.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Drug-resistant frontal lobe epilepsy: A review.SAGE open medicine · 2025Review
- Multimodal evaluation of network activity and optogenetic interventions in human hippocampal slices.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- Emergent responsive neurostimulation in pediatric super-refractory epilepsia partialis continua.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe RNS System is a direct brain-responsive neurostimulation system that is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures based on safety and effectiveness data from controlled clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of the RNS System.
methodsEight comprehensive epilepsy centers conducted a chart review of patients treated with the RNS System for at least 1 year, in accordance with the indication for use. Data included device-related serious adverse events and the median percent change in disabling seizure frequency from baseline at years 1, 2, and 3 of treatment and at the most recent follow-up.
resultsOne hundred fifty patients met the criteria for analysis. The median reduction in seizures was 67% (interquartile range [IQR] = 33%-93%, n = 149) at 1 year, 75% (IQR = 50%-94%, n = 93) at 2 years, 82% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 38) at ≥3 years, and 74% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 150) at last follow-up (mean = 2.3 years). Thirty-five percent of patients had a ≥90% seizure frequency reduction, and 18% of patients reported being clinically seizure-free at last follow-up. Seizure frequency reductions were similar regardless of patient age, age at epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, seizure onset in mesial temporal or neocortical foci, magnetic resonance imaging findings, prior intracranial monitoring, prior epilepsy surgery, or prior vagus nerve stimulation treatment. The infection rate per procedure was 2.9% (6/150 patients); five of the six patients had an implant site infection, and one had osteomyelitis. Lead revisions were required in 2.7% (4/150), and 2.0% (3/150) of patients had a subdural hemorrhage, none of which had long-lasting neurological consequences. SIGNIFICANCE: In this real-world experience, safety was similar and clinical seizure outcomes exceeded those of the prospective clinical trials, corroborating effectiveness of this therapy and suggesting that clinical experience has informed more effective programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.