Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658325›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2020

Real-world experience with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal onset seizures.

Babak Razavi, Vikram R Rao, Christine Lin, Krzysztof A Bujarski, Sanjay E Patra, David E Burdette, Eric B Geller, Mesha-Gay M Brown, Emily A Johnson, Cornelia Drees and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Responsive neurostimulation in children, adolescents, and young Adults-Longitudinal effectiveness and safety.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brain-computer interface: an update for the clinicians.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Babak RazaviStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8623-8161
Vikram R RaoUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6389-2638
Christine LinStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Krzysztof A BujarskiDartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1329-5085
Sanjay E PatraSpectrum Health Center, Michigan State University School of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
David E BurdetteSpectrum Health Center, Michigan State University School of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Eric B GellerSt. Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.
Mesha-Gay M BrownUniversity of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-3723
Emily A JohnsonWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Cornelia DreesUniversity of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9977-983X
Edward F ChangUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Janet E GreenwoodKeck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christianne N HeckKeck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Barbara C JobstDartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Ryder P GwinnSwedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicole M WarnerSwedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Casey H HalpernStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-216X
Stanford University · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USSpectrum Health · USSwedish Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Southern California · USSaint Barnabas Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe RNS System is a direct brain-responsive neurostimulation system that is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures based on safety and effectiveness data from controlled clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of the RNS System.

methodsEight comprehensive epilepsy centers conducted a chart review of patients treated with the RNS System for at least 1 year, in accordance with the indication for use. Data included device-related serious adverse events and the median percent change in disabling seizure frequency from baseline at years 1, 2, and 3 of treatment and at the most recent follow-up.

resultsOne hundred fifty patients met the criteria for analysis. The median reduction in seizures was 67% (interquartile range [IQR] = 33%-93%, n = 149) at 1 year, 75% (IQR = 50%-94%, n = 93) at 2 years, 82% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 38) at ≥3 years, and 74% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 150) at last follow-up (mean = 2.3 years). Thirty-five percent of patients had a ≥90% seizure frequency reduction, and 18% of patients reported being clinically seizure-free at last follow-up. Seizure frequency reductions were similar regardless of patient age, age at epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, seizure onset in mesial temporal or neocortical foci, magnetic resonance imaging findings, prior intracranial monitoring, prior epilepsy surgery, or prior vagus nerve stimulation treatment. The infection rate per procedure was 2.9% (6/150 patients); five of the six patients had an implant site infection, and one had osteomyelitis. Lead revisions were required in 2.7% (4/150), and 2.0% (3/150) of patients had a subdural hemorrhage, none of which had long-lasting neurological consequences. SIGNIFICANCE: In this real-world experience, safety was similar and clinical seizure outcomes exceeded those of the prospective clinical trials, corroborating effectiveness of this therapy and suggesting that clinical experience has informed more effective programming.

Indexed as

Implantable NeurostimulatorsAdolescentAdultAgedDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectric Stimulation TherapyElectrocorticographyEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultbrain-responsive neurostimulationdrug-resistantmedically intractable epilepsyRNS System

Identifiers

PMID32658325
PMCPMC7496294
OpenAlexW3042961397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.