Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32658250›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2022

Long-term Safety and Immunogenicity of a Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Candidate in Children and Adults: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study.

Chukiat Sirivichayakul, Elizabeth A Barranco-Santana, Inés Esquilín Rivera, Jennifer Kilbury, Marsha Raanan, Astrid Borkowski, Athanasia Papadimitriou, Derek Wallace

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01511250 (A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Age Descending and Expansion Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Tetravalent Chimeric Dengue Vaccine in Healthy Volunteers Between the Ages of 1.5 - 45 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01511250 phase2completednot on this map

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Age Descending and Expansion Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Tetravalent Chimeric Dengue Vaccine in Healthy Volunteers Between the Ages of 1.5 - 45 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorTakedaRan2011 to 2016Enrolled360ConditionsHealthyArmsTDV, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of a Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine in Children and Adolescents: An Analysis by Age Group.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Emerging and Pandemic Pathogens: Lessons Learned From a Clinical Research Network.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. TAK-003 Dengue Vaccine Safety: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chukiat SirivichayakulDepartment of Tropical Pediatrics, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Elizabeth A Barranco-SantanaCAIMED Center, Ponce School of Medicine, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, Puerto Rico.
Inés Esquilín RiveraDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Jennifer KilburyTakeda Vaccines Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Marsha RaananTakeda Vaccines Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Astrid BorkowskiTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Athanasia PapadimitriouTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Derek WallaceTakeda Vaccines Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report long-term safety and immunogenicity of Takeda's tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) in healthy children and adults living in dengue-endemic areas in Puerto Rico, Columbia, Singapore, and Thailand.

methodsIn part 1 of this phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial we sequentially enrolled 1.5-45 year olds (n = 148) into 4 age-descending groups, randomized 2:1 to receive 2 doses of TAK-003 or placebo 90 days apart. In part 2, 1-11 year olds (n = 212) were enrolled and randomized 3:1 to TAK-003 or placebo groups. We assessed neutralizing antibody titers for the 4 dengue serotypes (DENV) up to month 36 in part 1, and symptomatic dengue and serious adverse events (SAEs) up to month 36 in both parts.

resultsAt month 36, seropositivity rates were 97.3%, 98.7%, 88.0% and 56.0% for DENV-1, -2, -3 and -4, respectively. Seropositivity rates varied significantly for DENV-4 according to serostatus at baseline (89.5% in seropositives versus 21.6% in seronegatives). No vaccine-related SAEs were reported.

conclusionsThe trial demonstrated persistence of neutralizing antibody titers against TAK-003 over 3 years in children and adults living in dengue-endemic countries, with limited contribution from natural infection. TAK-003 was well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01511250.

Indexed as

DengueDengue VaccinesDengue VirusAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChildHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDengue VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, Combineddengueimmunogenicitypersistencesafetyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID32658250
PMCPMC9071315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.