ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2020
Assessment of energy expenditure: are calories measured differently for different diets?
Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effects of a Powdered Meal Replacement on Inflammation, Gut Microbiota, and Metabolism in People With Excess Body Weight-A Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Trial
- 25-Hydroxyvitamin D status does not affect energy metabolism among young, healthy, non-obese adults: a metabolic chamber study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Trial
- Intra-Assessment Resting Metabolic Rate Variability Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Middle-Aged Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Exploring the Influence of Gut Microbiome on Energy Metabolism in Humans.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Review
- Review
- Acute Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation on Energy Expenditure at Resting and during Uphill Walking in Healthy Young Men.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Coffee on Prostate Cancer Prevention.BioMed research international · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe prevalence and burden of obesity has reached alarming levels. The assessment of human energy expenditure enables the identification of obesity-prone and obesity-resistant individuals and helps to explain the short and long-term success of weight loss treatments. In this review, we describe the state-of-the-art methods used in the assessment of human energy expenditure and the impact of dietary intake on the interpretation of the data. RECENT
findingsThe reference techniques to assess energy expenditure in humans have not significantly changed during the last century. Today, indirect calorimetry, either using a metabolic chamber or a metabolic cart, is the favored method to assess human energy expenditure and is the only method enabling the assessment of macronutrient oxidation. The doubly labeled water method however provides accurate assessment of human energy expenditure under free living conditions. SUMMARY: Although energy expenditure and macronutrient oxidation can be assessed by simple calculations from oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production, these calculations can provide erroneous results or require corrections and/or more complex interpretation when several biochemical pathways are simultaneously engaged. Such physiological mechanisms are often elicited by dietary interventions including, among other, gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis, ketogenesis, alcohol oxidation and under or overfeeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.