Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657759›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Fluid Administration in Emergency Room Limited by Lung Ultrasound in Patients with Sepsis: Protocol for a Prospective Phase II Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mouhand F H Mohamed, Nathalie M Malewicz, Hanan Ibrahim Zehry, Dina A Monim Hussain, Judah Leão Barouh, Adriana V Cançado, Jeancarllo Sousa Silva, Salah Suwileh, Jose Retamal Carvajal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Mouhand F H Mohamed *Department of General Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-8014
Nathalie M Malewicz *Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-203X
Hanan Ibrahim ZehryDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1226-9034
Dina A Monim HussainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-8102
Judah Leão BarouhDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-1175
Adriana V CançadoRadiology Department, Santa Casa Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-6256
Jeancarllo Sousa SilvaDivision of Oncological Surgery, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-3357
Salah SuwilehDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-1185
Jose Retamal CarvajalFaculty Of Emergency Medicine, Universidad Del Desarrollo-Clinica Alemana De Santiago, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-9779
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAGrupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte · BRHarvard University · USHiroshima University · JPUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas · BRYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis remains a major health challenge with high mortality. Adequate volume administration is fundamental for a successful outcome. However, individual fluid needs differ between patients due to varying degrees of systemic vasodilation, circulatory flow maldistribution, and increased vascular permeability. The current fluid resuscitation practice has been questioned. Fluid overload is associated with higher mortality in sepsis. A sign of fluid overload is extravascular lung water, seen as B lines in lung ultrasound. B lines correlate inversely with oxygenation (measured by a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen ie, PaO2/FiO2). Thus, B lines seen by bedside ultrasound may have a role in guiding fluid therapy.

objectiveWe aim to evaluate if fluid administration guided by lung ultrasound in patients with sepsis in emergency departments will lead to better oxygenation and patient outcomes than those in the standard therapy.

methodsA phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, superiority trial will be performed. Patients will be recruited at emergency departments of the participating centers. A total of 340 patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention or standard-of-care group (30mL/kg). The intervention group will receive ultrasound-guided intravenous fluid until 3 B lines appear. The primary outcome will be oxygenation (measured as PaO2/FiO2 ratio) at 48 hours after starting intravenous fluid administration. Secondary outcomes will be patients' outcome parameters, including oxygenation after 15 mL/kg fluid at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours; sepsis progress through Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores; pulmonary edema evaluation; and 30-day mortality.

resultsThe trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Institutional review board approval will be sought after the participating sites are selected. The protocol will be registered once the institutional review board approval is granted. The trial duration is expected to be 1.5-2.5 years. The study is planned to be performed from 2021 to 2022, with enrollment starting in 2021. First results are expected in 2022. Informed written consent will be obtained before the patient's enrollment in the study. An interim analysis and data monitoring will ensure the patient safety. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and discussed at international conferences.

conclusionsThis is a protocol for a randomized control trial that aims to evaluate the role of bedside ultrasound in guiding fluid therapy in patients with sepsis via B lines evaluation. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/15997.

Indexed as

B-Linesemergency departmentfluid resuscitationlungoutcomesoxygenationPaO2/FiO2point-of-care ultrasoundpulmonary edemasepsisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32657759
PMCPMC7481877
OpenAlexW3016995167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.