Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657586›Full record

ReviewJournal of proteome research2020

Proteomics and Informatics for Understanding Phases and Identifying Biomarkers in COVID-19 Disease.

Anthony D Whetton, George W Preston, Semira Abubeker, Nophar Geifman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of proteome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Peripheral Blood Genes Crosstalk between COVID-19 and Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Host and viral proteins involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection differentially bind heme.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony D WhettonStoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health (FBMH), University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1098-3878
George W PrestonStoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health (FBMH), University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, United Kingdom.
Semira AbubekerStoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health (FBMH), University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4GJ, United Kingdom.
Nophar GeifmanCentre for Health Informatics, FBMH, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M008959/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, has necessitated the urgent development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Rapid research and development, on an international scale, has already generated assays for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA and host immunoglobulins. However, the complexities of COVID-19 are such that fuller definitions of patient status, trajectory, sequelae, and responses to therapy are now required. There is accumulating evidence-from studies of both COVID-19 and the related disease SARS-that protein biomarkers could help to provide this definition. Proteins associated with blood coagulation (D-dimer), cell damage (lactate dehydrogenase), and the inflammatory response (e.g., C-reactive protein) have already been identified as possible predictors of COVID-19 severity or mortality. Proteomics technologies, with their ability to detect many proteins per analysis, have begun to extend these early findings. To be effective, proteomics strategies must include not only methods for comprehensive data acquisition (e.g., using mass spectrometry) but also informatics approaches via which to derive actionable information from large data sets. Here we review applications of proteomics to COVID-19 and SARS and outline how pipelines involving technologies such as artificial intelligence could be of value for research on these diseases.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralProteomicsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersCOVID-19Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansPrognosisSARS-CoV-2Biomarkersartificial intelligenceassaybiomarkerCOVID-19diagnosismarkerprognosisproteomicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32657586
PMCPMC7384384
OpenAlexW3041547283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.