Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657412›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Geometric potentials from deep learning improve prediction of CDR H3 loop structures.

Jeffrey A Ruffolo, Carlos Guerra, Sai Pooja Mahajan, Jeremias Sulam, Jeffrey J Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antibody Affinity Maturation by Computational Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. AI Models for Protein Design are Driving Antibody Engineering.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey A RuffoloProgram in Molecular Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Carlos GuerraDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Sai Pooja MahajanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Jeremias SulamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Jeffrey J GrayProgram in Molecular Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

PROGRAM IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008403 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, DOUGLAS E. · 1990 to 2019
$13.5M
Prediction of the Structure of Therapeutic Antibodies with their AntigensR01GM078221 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY, JEFFREY J · 2006 to 2020
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078221NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAntibody structure is largely conserved, except for a complementarity-determining region featuring six variable loops. Five of these loops adopt canonical folds which can typically be predicted with existing methods, while the remaining loop (CDR H3) remains a challenge due to its highly diverse set of observed conformations. In recent years, deep neural networks have proven to be effective at capturing the complex patterns of protein structure. This work proposes DeepH3, a deep residual neural network that learns to predict inter-residue distances and orientations from antibody heavy and light chain sequence. The output of DeepH3 is a set of probability distributions over distances and orientation angles between pairs of residues. These distributions are converted to geometric potentials and used to discriminate between decoy structures produced by RosettaAntibody and predict new CDR H3 loop structures de novo.

resultsWhen evaluated on the Rosetta antibody benchmark dataset of 49 targets, DeepH3-predicted potentials identified better, same and worse structures [measured by root-mean-squared distance (RMSD) from the experimental CDR H3 loop structure] than the standard Rosetta energy function for 33, 6 and 10 targets, respectively, and improved the average RMSD of predictions by 32.1% (1.4 Å). Analysis of individual geometric potentials revealed that inter-residue orientations were more effective than inter-residue distances for discriminating near-native CDR H3 loops. When applied to de novo prediction of CDR H3 loop structures, DeepH3 achieves an average RMSD of 2.2 ± 1.1 Å on the Rosetta antibody benchmark. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DeepH3 source code and pre-trained model parameters are freely available at https://github.com/Graylab/deepH3-distances-orientations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAntibodiesComplementarity Determining RegionsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationAntibodiesComplementarity Determining Regions

Identifiers

PMID32657412
PMCPMC7355305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.