ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Inference attacks against differentially private query results from genomic datasets including dependent tuples.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential privacy for medical deep learning: methods, tradeoffs, and deployment implications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Safeguarding Privacy in Genome Research: A Comprehensive Framework for Authors.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing healthcare data analytics with federated learning: A comprehensive survey of applications, systems, and future directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Federated privacy-protected meta- and mega-omics data analysis in multi-center studies with a fully open-source analytic platform.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Safeguarding Privacy in Genome Research: A Comprehensive Framework for Authors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Assessing Privacy Vulnerabilities in Genetic Data Sets: Scoping Review.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A Survey on Differential Privacy for Medical Data Analysis.Annals of data science · 2023Review
- Tuning Privacy-Utility Tradeoff in Genomic Studies Using Selective SNP Hiding.Proceedings of the ... Asia-Pacific bioinformatics conference · 2023Article
- Privacy-aware estimation of relatedness in admixed populations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- From molecules to genomic variations: Accelerating genome analysis via intelligent algorithms and architectures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Privacy-Preserving and Efficient Verification of the Outcome in Genome-Wide Association Studies.Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThe rapid decrease in the sequencing technology costs leads to a revolution in medical research and clinical care. Today, researchers have access to large genomic datasets to study associations between variants and complex traits. However, availability of such genomic datasets also results in new privacy concerns about personal information of the participants in genomic studies. Differential privacy (DP) is one of the rigorous privacy concepts, which received widespread interest for sharing summary statistics from genomic datasets while protecting the privacy of participants against inference attacks. However, DP has a known drawback as it does not consider the correlation between dataset tuples. Therefore, privacy guarantees of DP-based mechanisms may degrade if the dataset includes dependent tuples, which is a common situation for genomic datasets due to the inherent correlations between genomes of family members.
resultsIn this article, using two real-life genomic datasets, we show that exploiting the correlation between the dataset participants results in significant information leak from differentially private results of complex queries. We formulate this as an attribute inference attack and show the privacy loss in minor allele frequency (MAF) and chi-square queries. Our results show that using the results of differentially private MAF queries and utilizing the dependency between tuples, an adversary can reveal up to 50% more sensitive information about the genome of a target (compared to original privacy guarantees of standard DP-based mechanisms), while differentially privacy chi-square queries can reveal up to 40% more sensitive information. Furthermore, we show that the adversary can use the inferred genomic data obtained from the attribute inference attack to infer the membership of a target in another genomic dataset (e.g. associated with a sensitive trait). Using a log-likelihood-ratio test, our results also show that the inference power of the adversary can be significantly high in such an attack even using inferred (and hence partially incorrect) genomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/nourmadhoun/Inference-Attacks-Differential-Privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.