Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32657384›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Boosting the accuracy of protein secondary structure prediction through nearest neighbor search and method hybridization.

Spencer Krieger, John Kececioglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein Secondary Structure Prediction With a Reductive Deep Learning Method.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Spencer KriegerDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
John KececiogluDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein secondary structure prediction is a fundamental precursor to many bioinformatics tasks. Nearly all state-of-the-art tools when computing their secondary structure prediction do not explicitly leverage the vast number of proteins whose structure is known. Leveraging this additional information in a so-called template-based method has the potential to significantly boost prediction accuracy.

methodWe present a new hybrid approach to secondary structure prediction that gains the advantages of both template- and non-template-based methods. Our core template-based method is an algorithmic approach that uses metric-space nearest neighbor search over a template database of fixed-length amino acid words to determine estimated class-membership probabilities for each residue in the protein. These probabilities are then input to a dynamic programming algorithm that finds a physically valid maximum-likelihood prediction for the entire protein. Our hybrid approach exploits a novel accuracy estimator for our core method, which estimates the unknown true accuracy of its prediction, to discern when to switch between template- and non-template-based methods.

resultsOn challenging CASP benchmarks, the resulting hybrid approach boosts the state-of-the-art Q8 accuracy by more than 2-10%, and Q3 accuracy by more than 1-3%, yielding the most accurate method currently available for both 3- and 8-state secondary structure prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A preliminary implementation in a new tool we call Nnessy is available free for non-commercial use at http://nnessy.cs.arizona.edu.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyProtein Structure, SecondaryProteins

Identifiers

PMID32657384
PMCPMC7355242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.